Skip to main content

In “The Biggest Lie in Personal Finance”, Nick Maggiulli voices an extreme level of irritation with the proliferation of “How I retired at 35” stories.

“All of these early retirement articles are the same. They all say things like, “Make it a goal”, “Track your expenses”, “Establish a system.” Blah. Blah. Blah. But none of these things are the actual reason for how they retired early. Because the actual reason is either (1) earning a high income or (2) having an absurdly low level of spending, or both.”

The central problem is that the vast majority of people cannot save their way into financial health – their income is too low. Mr. Maggiulli notes that the lowest-earning 20 per cent of Americans spend more than their income on necessities and that the next wealthiest 20 per cent make just enough to avoid using credit to pay for food and shelter.

Story continues below advertisement

Designing and following a household budget is, of course, a good idea that will help generate wealth. Skipping the daily latte and re-using dental floss, however, is unlikely to allow a 25 year old to retire in a decade unless they’re lucky enough to make a ton of money right out of school.

I agree with the author that stories about retiring before 40 are a form of financial pornography with minimal application to the general population. In one way or another these people are anomalies.

As a public service, the article includes more realistic headlines for retiring early, “Wanna retire at 27? Marry rich” and “Foregoing Procreation, Living Like a Hermit, and 4 Other Ways to Retire in Your 30s”.

-- Scott Barlow, Globe and Mail market strategist

This is the Globe Investor newsletter, published three times each week. If someone has forwarded this e-mail newsletter to you or you’re reading this on the web, you can sign up for the newsletter and others on our newsletter signup page.

Stocks to ponder

Blackline Safety Corp. Year-to-date, this small-cap company’s share price has rallied nearly 17 per cent with a further 45 per cent gain anticipated by analysts. Over the past five trading sessions, up until Wednesday, the share price has spiked 9 per cent. As a result, the stock price may fill in this gap and could retreat to the $7 level in the near-term. Jennifer Dowty profiles the stock.

Story continues below advertisement

Gilead Sciences Inc. This is the latest biotechnology stock to rally as investors bet on the emergence of a drug to defeat the coronavirus. But analysts are taking a more sober position on Gilead: Good stock, ignore the coronavirus-fuelled hype. David Berman reports.

Real Matters Inc. In recent weeks, there has been a flight to bonds, driving the U.S. 10-year Treasury yield down to the 1.5 per cent level from around 1.9 per cent at the start of the year. This company benefits from a low interest rate environment. Furthermore, with a proven management team, this company is delivering solid growth while the stock is trading at a reasonable valuation. Jennifer Dowty profiles the stock.

The Rundown

Dividend growth is the power behind the gains of these stocks over the past decade

As a company’s dividend growth goes, so goes its share price. Rob Carrick provides some examples, and the correlation is quite striking.

Don’t laugh – GM just might be the better stock pick right now than high-flying Tesla

Story continues below advertisement

Tesla Inc. is suddenly everyone’s must-have, gotta-buy stock. The upstart automaker’s stock price has surged more than 60 per cent over the past week and rose more than US$100 on Tuesday to close at US$887.06 – about double the level it began the year. By way of contrast, General Motors Co. shares look about as exciting as a flat tire. The stock has wandered downward in recent months and is now trading at one of its lowest levels of the past year. So which stock is the more attractive investment? The answer may not be as obvious as you think. Read more from Ian McGugan.

Others (for subscribers)

John Heinzl’s model dividend growth portfolio as of Jan. 31, 2020

Wednesday’s analyst upgrades and downgrades

Wednesday’s Insider Report: Director invests over $1-million in this Canadian large-cap stock

Tuesday’s analyst upgrades and downgrades

Story continues below advertisement

Number Cruncher: Risk and opportunity: 15 U.S. stocks with high exposure to China

Number Cruncher: These 15 stocks with strong balance sheets are good choices for turbulent times

Others (for everyone)

Ackman’s Pershing Square exits Starbucks, sticks by Chipotle

Hedge funds eye opportunities in Chinese stocks rattled by coronavirus outbreak

Globe Advisor

Story continues below advertisement

Actively managed ETFs to consider for an RRSP

Are you a financial advisor? Register for Globe Advisor (www.globeadvisor.com) for free daily and weekly newsletters, in-depth industry coverage and analysis, and access to ProStation - a powerful tool to help you manage your clients’’ portfolios.

Ask Globe Investor

Question: What do you think of the iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats Index ETF (CDZ)? It seems to follow a similar approach to your model Yield Hog Dividend Growth Portfolio.

Answer: The idea behind CDZ is a good one: The exchange-traded fund invests in stocks that have raised their dividends for at least five consecutive years, which means it will generally include companies whose revenues and earnings are also growing steadily.

There’s some wiggle room in the methodology, however: According to S&P Dow Jones Indices, which manages the index that CDZ tracks, constituents “can maintain the same dividend for a maximum of two consecutive years within that five year period.”

Story continues below advertisement

That’s not a deal-breaker for me. However, one concern I have is that CDZ weights stocks based on their dividend yields. This means stocks with the highest yields account for the biggest positions in the fund. In the past, this has led to situations where troubled companies with unsustainably high dividend yields – such as Aimia and Corus Entertainment Inc. – have been the ETF’s top holdings, only to cut their dividends.

The weighting methodology – along with CDZ’s relatively high management expense ratio of 0.66 per cent – may help to explain why CDZ’s five-year annualized total return of 5.35 per cent (through Dec. 31) lagged the S&P/TSX Composite Index’s total return of 6.28 per cent. To be fair, several other Canadian dividend ETFs also trailed the S&P/TSX. Those that beat the index included the Horizons Active Canadian Dividend ETF (HAL), with a five-year annualized total return of 7.5 per cent, and the Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF (PDC), which returned 6.44 per cent.

Remember that these are backward-looking performance numbers, and it’s possible that ETFs that lagged the pack over the past five years could turn out to be winners over the next five years. Rather than pick a single ETF, you may wish to diversify by spreading your money across a few different funds. Just as important as the ETFs you choose is your behaviour as an investor. If you buy and hold through good times and bad, reinvest your dividends and resist the urge to trade, you’ll very likely be pleased with your results over the long run.

--John Heinzl

Do you have a question for Globe Investor? Send it our way via this form. Questions and answers will be edited for length.

What’s up in the days ahead

The TSX is back trading at record highs as fears subside about the economic toll of the coronavirus. But a closer look at the TSX stocks with the greatest revenue exposure to China shows a different story for some of Canada’s leading equities. Tim Shufelt will report

Click here to see the Globe Investor earnings and economic news calendar.

More Globe Investor coverage

For more Globe Investor stories, follow us on Twitter @globeinvestor

Click here share your view of our newsletter and give us your suggestions.

You may also be interested in our Market Update or Carrick on Money newsletters. Explore them on our newsletter signup page.

Compiled by Globe Investor Staff

Related topics

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies