Skip to main content

In the wake of two years of devastating wildfires in California, Wall Street is incorporating a new risk metric when evaluating companies: climate resiliency.

Investors, analysts, research firms and companies are putting more emphasis on how climate issues ranging from rising sea levels to record heatwaves will affect profits and revenues in the United States and what companies are doing to address those risks.

Companies located in areas such as California, Florida and Louisiana that put them at a higher risk of being affected by more severe weather patterns are increasingly being asked how they will protect their businesses from climate change.

Story continues below advertisement

Over all, more than 70 firms have discussed the potential impact of climate change on their business on their quarterly results calls since the start of the year, more than double that of last year or any other year since 2014, according to a Reuters analysis of Refinitiv data.

As a result, fund managers, who typically do not incorporate environmental attributes in their analysis of a company, are taking a closer look at whether the physical locations of their property and equipment will put them at a higher risk of being affected by climate change.

“Without expecting a company to significantly change its strategy, we are increasingly having conversations with management teams to ask them about their plans for climate resilience,” said Arthur Hurley, senior portfolio manager on the Columbia Real Estate Fund.

So-called ESG funds, which focus on a company’s environmental, social, and governance attributes, have been at the forefront of focusing on the physical risks of climate change.

But now fund managers such as Mr. Hurley are finding that companies in their portfolio, such as Equity Lifestyle Properties Inc., are revealing to analysts on their earnings call that they are evaluating the potential for rising water levels when it purchases new marinas. Shares of the company are up 43 per cent for the year to date.

Mr. Hurley said he is actively going into companies, such as Equity Lifestyle and Boston Properties Inc., that are preemptively addressing potential climate effects, whether by focusing more on the elevation of potential developments or incorporating construction design elements such as putting critical equipment above floor grade.

Fund managers say the bankruptcy of San Francisco-based power company Pacific Gas & Electric Co. in January prompted them to put more emphasis on climate risks.

Story continues below advertisement

Wildfires that broke out Oct. 23 could undermine California’s largest utility’s US$14-billion plan to finance its turnaround after filing in January for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection anticipating its liabilities from massive wildfires in 2017 and 2018 blamed on its equipment could top US$30-billion.

ONCE AN UNCONTEMPLATED RISK

At the same time, there have been 10 weather and climate disaster events that have caused more than US$1-billion in damages since the start of the year, already nearly double the average of 6.3 events for each full-year between 1980 and 2018, according to National Centers for Environmental Information.

Insurance claims for what were once considered secondary perils – such as wildfires and hail – have accounted for US$13-billion out of US$15-billion in natural disaster claims through August, according to Swiss Re.

The increase in wildfires has prompted underwriters such as Hiscox Ltd. to incorporate new risks models and stop insuring some clients in high-risk areas such as California.

Over all, 10 per cent of insurers refused to renew policies in wildfire-prone areas in California in 2018, according to the California Department of Insurance.

Research firms including S&P Global’s Trucost division are rolling out more climate-risk analytics that are meant to help investors assess the specific climate risks that each company faces.

Story continues below advertisement

The firm is publishing a report in the next few weeks that will focus on companies that face the highest physical risks of climate change, a spokeswoman said.

In March, Silicon Valley startup Jupiter Inc. announced that it had completed a US$23-million Series B funding round to expand its analytics services that can provide investors and companies with detailed short- and long-term weather patterns for specific locations.

“This is something that’s not going away soon,” said Gregory Peters, senior portfolio manager at PGIM Fixed Income.

As a result, he has trimmed his positions in some California utilities, while analysts on his real estate team are increasingly focusing on climate risk.

“That risk attached to the utilities is kind of a new thing that we didn’t necessarily contemplate a couple of years ago.”

Report an error
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter