Skip to main content

It’s going to take more than a dose of yuan weakness and softer metal prices to wreak havoc on global markets this time around.

Investors are having flashbacks to 2015-16 amid fears over China’s industrial complex while the country gets dragged into a trade war. But markets are unlikely to be revisited by the deflationary monster of years past.

From a solid U.S. manufacturing trajectory to a resilient credit cycle, here’s why.

Story continues below advertisement

Oil’s well that ends well

For one, crude prices are on a tear compared with three years ago, juicing commodity-linked assets and sending benign signals about the global growth cycle.

In 2015, producers reticent to address a supply glut kept crude depressed. Today, the shoe is on the other foot, with stockpile drawdowns and rising prices despite ever-increasing domestic production.

Firm oil prices are here to stay, according to Bank of America Corp., which projects the market will remain in structural deficit for most of the next six quarters.

In turn, oil’s rise is buoying junk bonds, an asset class dubbed the canary in the coal mine for the U.S. business cycle. The iShares iBoxx High Yield Corporate Bond ETF is in the green this year – in 2015, it gave back 5 per cent.

The “chances of a credit cycle playing out are lower today than immediately after the meltdown in energy/commodities/EM and going into Brexit uncertainty in the middle of 2016,” B of A strategists wrote in a note.

And the resilience in high-yield credit is broad-based: premiums have tightened across a slew of sectors so far this year, in contrast to spiking spreads in 2015.

Story continues below advertisement

While global growth may have come off the boil, manufacturing sectors around the world – particularly the United States – are on a much firmer footing. Monthly purchasing managers’ indexes point to a solid expansion in factory activity, while in early 2016, the global gauge bottomed at 50, implying stagnation.

Meanwhile, the bar for China to export disinflation via currency depreciation has also been raised, according to Neil Dutta, head of U.S. economics at Renaissance Macro Research.

“In the second half of 2015, core PCE inflation ran just 1.3 per cent annualized,” he said. “It is north of 2 per cent on a six month basis now, which implies there is some room to deal with the deflationary consequences of a strengthening in the U.S. dollar.”

And investors are sanguine.

The low cost of options that pay out should the Consumer Price Index average an annual rise of less than zero over the next two years shows just how different the domestic backdrop is compared with 2015.

Stemming the outflows

Story continues below advertisement

The “Made in China” risk shouldn’t be overstated, either.

In early 2016, fears over the country’s financial stability took centre stage amid accelerating outflows and rampant expectations for continued currency depreciation while corporates scrambled to cover mismatches between their assets and liabilities. That same dynamic has yet to rear its head.

“The real capital outflows are manageable as the RMB depreciation expectation remains largely stable,” Macquarie strategist Teresa Lam said in a note. “This should ease the market‘s worry that the weakness of RMB was triggered by significant portfolio outflows.”

In addition, investors have reason to downplay tentative signs of a cooling in Chinese growth, chalking it up to seasonal factors and delays on big-ticket purchases ahead of cuts to levies on imported vehicles.

The six-month moving average of Bloomberg’s estimate for annual expansion sits at 7 percent in May – a half a percentage point better than it was ahead of the August 2015 shock devaluation of the yuan.

For a true repeat of 2015, the carnage in Chinese and emerging-market equities will need to intensify.

Story continues below advertisement

Back then, the Shanghai Composite ultimately fell 50 per cent from peak to intermediate trough. Roughly 5½ months removed from its recent high, the index is down 21 per cent. Likewise, the MSCI Emerging Market Index has suffered a less-punitive drawdown.

America first

The U.S. equity resilience is even more striking.

The S&P 500 Index is just 3 per cent away from its all-time high, and up 4.5 per cent since the dollar began to rise against the yuan in mid-April. In August, 2015, the benchmark U.S. stock gauge abruptly fell 10 per cent as markets reacted to China’s currency surprise.

The earnings trend is helping to fortify investors’ resolve that U.S. companies are better able to withstand exogenous shocks compared with three years ago.

Still, in case you need reminding: One potentially massive risk absent in 2015 threatens to shake the firmament of global markets.

Report an error
Tickers mentioned in this story
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies