Skip to main content

Inside the Market So how did active Canadian fund managers make out in the plunging markets of 2018? You’re about to find out

Last year’s heightened volatility was of little help to Canadian fund managers trying to outperform the stock market.

More than 75 per cent of active Canadian funds failed to beat equity benchmarks in 2018, according to new data from S&P Dow Jones Indices, undermining the idea that a sell-off is the stock picker’s time to shine.

Percentage of Funds Beating the Index 

Fund CategoryComparison Index1-Year (%)3-Year (%)5-Year (%)10-Year (%)
Canadian EquityS&P/TSX Composite23.15.69.79.0
Canadian Small-Cap/Mid-Cap EquityS&P/TSX Completion20.04.819.523.6
Canadian Dividend and Income EquityS&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats34.820.428.30.0
U.S. EquityS&P 500 (CAD)21.48.14.02.6
International EquityS&P EPAC LargeMidCap (CAD)44.414.08.54.8
Global EquityS&P Developed LargeMidCap (CAD)22.56.84.96.2

Source: S&P Dow Jones Indices 

“Volatility doesn’t make it easier to beat the market, especially year in, year out,” said Dan Hallett, vice-president and principal with HighView Financial Group, calling the common argument the “myth of the stock picker’s market.”

Story continues below advertisement

Once again, the data show that for a big majority of Canadian mutual funds, fees paid by investors more than offset fund manager performance in 2018.

The SPIVA scorecards generated by S&P Dow Jones Indices compare fund returns to relevant benchmarks, across a range of investment periods.

For 2018, the proportion of Canadian funds that came out ahead of their benchmarks range from a low of 20 per cent for Canadian small- and mid-cap equity, to a high of 44 per cent for equities representing Europe and the Asia Pacific region.

In other words, in no category did a majority of active managers prove capable of beating the market, after fees.

The long-term track record is even worse. More than nine out of 10 Canadian equity funds fell short of their benchmark over a 10-year period, the SPIVA report said.

The bull market in equities has not been kind to active management.

The S&P 500 index, for example, has been on the rise, with relatively few interruptions, for a full decade. A handful of giant technology names, such as the much-vaunted FAANG stocks (Facebook Inc., Amazon Inc., Apple Inc., Netflix Inc. and Google parent Alphabet Inc.), have provided much of the fuel for the market as a whole, making it an especially tough market to beat.

Story continues below advertisement

That challenge bears out in SPIVA figures, which show just 2.6 per cent of U.S. equity funds based in Canada outperforming the S&P 500 over the past 10 years.

Many stock pickers suggest their expertise will truly prove its worth in a serious market downturn, when active management might help minimize the losses to investors.

Most active funds failed to do that last year, however, when the S&P/TSX Composite Index had its worst calendar year since 2008, with a decline of 11.6 per cent.

“Active managers sell the dream of outperformance, not the reality – not after fees, anyway,” said Terry Shaunessy, president of Shaunessy Investment Counsel.

The mutual fund industry, meanwhile, has consistently argued that the SPIVA comparisons are unfair. Fund performance in the report is calculated net of fees, and is measured up against the returns of benchmarks without fees, rather than an investable alternative.

“When you compare a broad cross section of thousands of funds charging an average of about 2 per cent per year, you’re never going to see a majority of those outperform a costless theoretical benchmark,” Mr. Hallett said.

Story continues below advertisement

The main issue for investors emphasized by the report is not that stock pickers lack skill, but that fund fees tend to dilute that skill. Relatively high fees make the majority of funds “not worth investing in,” Mr. Hallett said.

If that’s true, Canadian investors have been slow to catch on.

Despite a global shift from higher-cost active management to cheaper indexing, most Canadian investors remain loyal to stock-picking strategies.

Excluding money market funds, Canadians had $1.12-trillion invested in mutual funds and exchange-traded funds at the end of last year, with 88.5 per cent of that money dedicated to active funds, according to a recent PWL Capital report based on Morningstar data.

In the United States, on the other hand, active funds’ total share of the market has shrunk to 63 per cent, with the flow of assets into passive funds outpacing flows into active funds for the past eight years’ straight.

Many Canadian investors would be better served by lower-cost, broad-market exposure, Mr. Shaunessy said, pointing out the recent introduction of balanced ETFs that offer a complete portfolio in a single trade, with MERs of 0.25 per cent or less.

Story continues below advertisement

“People can save themselves a lot of money.”

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter