Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Single mom Megan Kinch, with her eight-year-old daughter Esther, in Toronto, Ont., on Aug. 27, 2021. Kinch is an electrician apprentice, and couldn't work for 12 of the past 17 months due to school closures and lockdowns.

Tijana Martin/The Globe and Mail

With in-person school on the near horizon, many women whose careers were sidelined by child-care duties during the pandemic are eyeing a return to work. But even those whose re-entry is smooth will pay for their time away from the workplace in the form of lower lifetime earnings, missed advancement opportunities and lower pensions, researchers say.

Katherine Scott, a senior economist with the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives who wrote a paper earlier this year called Women, Work and COVID-19, says even short amounts of time away from work have a long-term impact on women’s earnings and their household’s prosperity.

“You don’t get that time back,” she said, adding the wage gap between women and men becomes more pronounced as they age, but is grounded in the choices women make earlier in their careers, such as whether to seek advancement, work full- or part-time, or to take time off to look after kids.

Story continues below advertisement

It’s typical to see women of child-bearing age reduce their hours, then their wage growth slows, Ms. Scott said, adding that these decisions can leave the family increasingly worse-off financially, over time. “Women typically make up 40 per cent of earnings in a given household,” she added, pointing out the long-term impact of time away from work also includes reduced employment insurance entitlement and lower pension contributions, leading to lower payments for women, who live longer and need it more as they age.

A paper released in March by University of British Columbia’s Sylvia Fuller and Yue Qian, COVID-19 and The Gender Gap in Employment Among Parents of Young Children in Canada suggests the particularities of COVID-19 may affect mothers’ careers even more than maternity leave.

Liberal housing pledge: What makes no sense, what makes good sense and what Canadians really need

An election promise to making bank fees more affordable

Prof. Qian, an associate professor of sociology, explains that while mothers already face a well-documented wage penalty, there are also significant job protections for mothers around the time of childbirth.

“There is a lot of grey area for how to deal with workers who have caregiving responsibilities during COVID. ... Lacking formal regulations may allow for more room for discrimination to occur,” she said, adding it is still very early days in the research of COVID-19’s effect on career outcomes.

She also says the pandemic has no clear end point, unlike a maternity leave, for which a business can plan. “If they want to assign very important work tasks, or want to promote someone to positions with greater responsibility, they may prefer workers with less potential disruptions,” she said.

Story continues below advertisement

Prof. Qian pointed to a Pew Research study from January that found mothers have been more likely to turn down important work than fathers since the pandemic began, likely because of their increased share of household duties.

Even before the pandemic, Ms. Kinch says she didn’t get much understanding from her bosses, all of them men, when she asked for accommodations related to child care.

Tijana Martin/The Globe and Mail

Electrician apprentice Megan Kinch, 39, is experiencing these effects first-hand. A single mother to a school-age daughter, she couldn’t work for 12 of the past 17 months because of school closings and lockdowns, while the virus dramatically exacerbated existing challenges finding child care in Toronto.

That meant she had to forgo raises associated with the number of hours she’d worked, and is a year further from finishing her apprenticeship. In 2019, Ms. Kinch made $60,000, and would have been making about $80,000 by this year if she hadn’t taken the time off. Instead, she made $30,000 last year, including payments from the Canada Emergency Response Benefit, and expects to make about $35,000 this year.

“I can barely pay rent,” said Ms. Kinch, who recently lost most of her possessions in a fire at her former apartment. She says her odd working hours, either early in the morning or late at night, mean she always has the added financial burden of child-care costs, whether the school is closed or not.

Even before the pandemic, Ms. Kinch says she didn’t get much understanding from her bosses, all of them men, when she asked for accommodations related to child care.

“I have actually called in sick and said I was hungover when I actually had to do child care,” she said, adding it was way more acceptable to superiors to say that.

Story continues below advertisement

All of the main political parties in the current election have promised to get women back at work through child-care policy – the Liberals and NDP through creating more spaces and $10-a-day daycare, and the Conservatives with a tax credit that increases for lower-income families. However, because the Conservative plan is based on family income, with less money going to families with one high-earning partner, this could incentivize lower-earning women to stay out of work if their income and the cost of child care are comparable, economist Tammy Schirle recently told The Globe and Mail.

Past TD Economics research on the “motherhood gap” shows women lose out on 3 per cent of their lifetime earnings for every year they spend away from work. Economists who spoke with The Globe for this article say they believe a similar penalty would apply to those taking time off to parent during COVID-19.

For Ms. Kinch, that could add up to a lifetime loss of at least $112,200 in today’s dollars (not adjusted for inflation), says Shannon Hickey, a former investment banker who now works helping women and couples structure their finances in Kelowna, B.C. The missed year will also lower Ms. Kinch’s contributions to the Canadian Pension Plan and her union’s pension.

“If I compare myself to my co-workers, I’m doing a lot worse financially, but if I compare myself to other single moms, I’m doing well,” Ms. Kinch said, adding she’s actually not surprised her year off could cost nearly twice her annual salary; she’s used to facing discrimination for her family status. “We are structurally placed in impossible positions and then blamed for it.”

Ms. Hickey says that’s a common refrain she’s heard from her female clients: Whether working while parenting during lockdowns or taking time off to care for kids, women have felt stuck in a position where there’s no good option.

On the financial side, she says one way women can compensate for the losses related to a leave is to increase the risk profile of a small, defined portion of their assets.

Story continues below advertisement

“Limit it to … say 10 per cent, and try to boost those,” she said, noting those who choose this strategy have to be willing to play the long game in case of a downturn.

Be smart with your money. Get the latest investing insights delivered right to your inbox three times a week, with the Globe Investor newsletter. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies