Skip to main content

Harry and Laila.

The Globe and Mail

A health scare last year has Harry looking to retire early. He’s 53 and hopes to hang up his hat in a couple of years. His wife, Laila, who is 48, plans to work another seven years or so.

Harry brings in $112,000 a year in a senior corporate job, while Laila earns $36,200 a year working for the government. They have two children in university and a small mortgage remaining on their East Coast home.

Harry is paying into a defined contribution pension plan at work where his contributions are matched by his employer. Laila is contributing to a defined-benefit pension plan that will pay her about $6,000 a year at 65. She is making extra contributions in order to “buy back” some years of service.

Story continues below advertisement

Harry knows retiring early will be a challenge. Given their ages, “is it possible to think of retirement?” he asks in an e-mail. “Do we need to downsize our house?” They wonder, too, whether they should set aside some money for their children’s university costs and in time, their weddings.

“If my wife keeps working, is it a good idea for me to start withdrawing from my RRSP when I retire?” Harry asks. He would draw enough so that his income would be taxed at the lowest income tax rate (combined federal and provincial), which cuts off at about $44,000.

The couple’s retirement spending target is $45,000 a year after tax.

We asked Ian Calvert, portfolio manager and financial planner at HighView Financial Group in Toronto, to look at Harry and Laila’s situation.

What the expert says

Harry and Laila’s main goal is to retire early, Mr. Calvert says. “They wonder if they can accomplish this without downsizing their house or changing their lifestyle.” They hope to preserve as much of their savings as possible, living mainly off their dividend income.

The family has total assets of about $1.58-million, of which $500,000 is their primary residence, the planner says. By the time Harry retires in 2021, their assets are forecast to have grown to $1.66-million. That assumes an average annual rate of return on their investment portfolio of 5 per cent a year (dividends and capital gains), a 2-per-cent inflation rate on their residence, and that both continue to contribute to their pension plans at work.

Laila has the option to buy back years of service on her defined benefit pension plan back to 2015, Mr. Calvert says. “Taking advantage of this is a great idea,” he says. “Having any amount of indexed defined benefit pension income in a retirement plan is a valuable component.”

Story continues below advertisement

In addition to their registered savings, Harry has $290,000 worth of stocks in a holding company (jointly owned with Laila), assets earned when he was an independent consultant. He kept the surplus income in his corporation. The holding company will provide flexibility in their retirement, the planner says. “Harry can strategically control his withdrawals and taxable income in the form of dividends from this account,” Mr. Calvert says. “For instance, he can choose to withdraw nothing in one year and a large amount in another, based on their needs and taxable income.”

To achieve their $45,000 spending goal, Harry and Laila will need income from several different sources over the course of their retirement, the planner says. In 2022, the first full year in which Harry is not reporting employment income, he should convert his registered retirement savings plan to a registered retirement income fund (RRIF) and his pension plan to a life income fund (LIF) and begin withdrawing more than the minimum, the planner says. Laila should do the same when she retires in 2026. She would start withdrawing from her RRSP/RRIF in 2027.

In his forecast, Mr. Calvert assumes they begin getting Canada Pension Plan and Old Age Security benefits at 65.

“The goal is to keep each of their incomes at or below $44,000 a year to have this income taxed at the lowest combined marginal tax rate,” Mr. Calvert says. “The years between retirement and age 65 will be their lowest-income years so they should take advantage of this.”

If they both withdraw the above amount from their savings, they would have more than they need for lifestyle spending, the planner notes. “They should establish a plan of withdrawing from their RRSPs, spending what they need, and using the surplus funds to build up their tax-free savings accounts,” he says. “Over time, they should be watching their RRSPs decline while their TFSAs grow, with the goal of maintaining their net worth.”

If they can achieve an annual rate of return of 5 per cent on their investable assets (dividends, interest and capital gains), they can meet their spending goal, indexed to inflation, while still preserving their capital, Mr. Calvert says. “However, there isn’t a tremendous amount of flexibility for emergencies, unexpected costs or helping their kids with weddings,” he says.

Story continues below advertisement

“Also, this is only achievable with the inclusion of CPP, OAS and Laila’s pension,” he says. “The expected return on the portfolio alone is not enough to cover their spending and annual taxes.” If their spending needs turn out to be greater than $45,000 a year, “they would have to accept watching their capital decline or downsize their house.”

As to Canada Pension Plan benefits, neither Harry nor Laila will receive the full retirement benefit for two reasons, the planner says. Because they arrived in Canada in 1995, they will not have paid into CPP long enough to get the maximum retirement benefit. Also, Laila’s current income of $36,000 a year does not entitle her to contribute the maximum to CPP.

Finally, Mr. Calvert looks at the couple’s investments. Harry is a self-directed investor who has built a portfolio of Canadian and U.S. dividend growth stocks. “The dividend yield on the portfolio is strong and the reinvestment of those dividends has been a great strategy,” the planner says. Many of their accounts have a yield of close to 4 per cent, “which is great for retirement cash flow.”

However, they are heading into retirement with a 100 per cent equity portfolio. “Few investors can stomach the ups and downs of an all-stock portfolio,” the planner says. “In a bear market, the dividend income suddenly takes a backseat to the grief experienced when watching prices fall for weeks and even months.”

Even if they could tolerate temporary market declines while they were working, they may not have the same patience in retirement, he adds. “It’s easier to weather a bear market when your working income keeps flowing. But the dynamic can change when you are relying on 100 per cent of the investment return for cash flow needs.”

Client situation

The people: Harry, 53, Laila, 48, and their two children

The problem: Given his health concerns, can they afford for Harry to retire from work in a couple of years and still meet their financial goals?

The plan: Harry retires at 55 and begins drawing on his RRSP, which he converts to an RRIF, as well as his DC pension, which he converts to a LIF. He draws enough to take full advantage of the lowest income tax bracket. Laila retires at 55 and begin drawing on her RRSP as well.

The payoff: Being better prepared for some of the risks, limitations and possible trade-offs involved in retiring young.

Monthly net income: $9,265

Assets: Cash $12,000; holding company stocks $290,000; his non-registered $40,000; his TFSA $33,000; her TFSA $17,000; his RRSP $225,000; her RRSP $160,000; his DC pension plan $200,000; estimated present value of her DB pension plan $84,560; RESP $14,000; residence $500,000. Total: $1.58-million

Story continues below advertisement

Monthly outlays: Mortgage $1,300; property tax $530; home insurance $100; utilities $440; maintenance garden $300; transportation $530; groceries $500; clothing $50; line of credit $180; gifts, charity $40; vacation, travel $300; other discretionary $100; dining, drinks, entertainment $80; sports, hobbies $100; club membership $40; subscriptions $30; other personal $10; health care $20; health, life insurance $200; phones, TV, internet $275; RRSPs $500; TFSAs $865; pension plan contributions $1,000. Total: $7,490 Surplus $1,775 goes to paying down debt.

Liabilities: Mortgage $65,000; line of credit $50,000. Total: $115,000

Want a free financial facelift? E-mail finfacelift@gmail.com.

Some details may be changed to protect the privacy of the persons profiled.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter