Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Natasha Knox is a fee-only certified financial planner and founder of Vancouver-area based Alaphia Financial Wellness.

Handout

Question from millennial Globe and Mail reader: When it comes to investing, my partner and I have very different risk tolerances. We are building a family and a future together, so how can we get on the same page?

Answer from Natasha Knox, a fee-only certified financial planner and founder of Vancouver-area based Pax Planning: It’s very normal for couples to have different appetites for risk. Getting on the same page about how to address this in terms of investments can be tricky. What many people do is simply invest the accounts in their own name, according to their own risk tolerance. But this approach has its challenges.

The main challenge is that even though the accounts are in individual names, the money is really family money and is earmarked for your shared future. In my mind, it’s not reasonable to expect that each spouse will have no opinions on the portfolio of the other spouse.

Story continues below advertisement

As a starting point, I would encourage both partners to think about risk in a broader sense. When it comes to investments, acknowledge that there is always some risk. Even guaranteed investment certificates and high interest savings accounts carry risk. There is a risk of outliving one’s money, and the risk of having your purchasing power eroded by inflation.

When it comes to market-based investments there are different kinds of risk. Some of those risks – such as sector and company specific risks – can be eliminated through diversification. Other risks such as macro-economic and systemic risks, cannot be completely diversified away, but they can certainly be greatly reduced and nearly eliminated through a long-term focus and a disciplined investing process.

Often, the biggest risk with a well-diversified yet aggressive portfolio is not the investment itself, but rather the investor behaviour in the face of volatility. Two of the biggest factors of investor success are: a high degree of volatility composure, and the personal financial capacity to weather the ups and downs of the market.

Capacity for risk is one of the things that risk-loving people often overlook. This is an area, where the safety-loving spouse’s inclinations are very valuable. Each of you brings an important perspective to the table.

When considering personal capacity for risk, there are two basic questions that you need to ask yourselves:

  • How much risk are we taking on in all domains of our life?
  • How can we safely manage risk in our life?

For example, factors that could contribute to risk, and lower financial capacity for more risk could include: having unpredictable or unreliable income; having a large amount of debt, including a really large mortgage; having cash flow deficits; and not having adequate insurance in place. Factors that contribute to security and increase capacity for more risk could include: a secure, predictable income; highly transferrable skills; having a surplus of cash flow; a company pension; low debt; a substantial emergency fund; and being adequately insured.

At least some of these risk factors will be within your control. By minimizing or eliminating those risks that are within your control, you will increase your shared capacity to be more aggressive with your investment portfolios.

Story continues below advertisement

Another question that is important, but often overlooked, is how much risk do you need to take in order to attain your financial goals? To a large degree, your investments can be shaped around what kinds of returns you actually need, and this should be the starting point for a conversation between the two of you. To do this, you will need to get a sense of your current savings levels toward your financial goals. This Globe and Mail set of “Calculate Your Life” tools and calculators is a handy place to get started.

Once you understand the returns that you need, you can have a substantial conversation with your spouse about how to fine-tune your approach to balance your individual comfort levels with respect to asset allocation, savings levels, and current lifestyle spending needs. If, however, you are aiming for significantly higher returns than what you need, and thereby taking on significant amounts of additional risk – you need to ask yourself why. What purpose does this additional risk serve in your financial plan? And is this a purpose on which both you and your spouse are aligned?

Typically, as financial and investment education increases, so too does the willingness to participate in market-based investments. Part of the key to getting on the same page is to make sure that what you’re reading is credible, and that you’re both accessing the same information.

Change doesn’t happen overnight, but if you think of risk broadly, safely manage the risks that can be managed, increase your level of volatility composure through financial education, and determine an asset allocation that is appropriate to your current lifestyle and future shared vision, then, over time, it is likely that your views on the investment piece of your financial plan will converge.

Are you a young person with a money question? Send it to us.

You can also join the Young Money Facebook group.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies