Skip to main content

Actor Steve Buscemi poses with his awards for outstanding performance by a male actor in a drama series and outstanding performance by an ensemble in a drama series for "Boardwalk Empire" at the 18th annual Screen Actors Guild Awards in Los Angeles, California January 29, 2012. Researchers found that the kind of fame Buscemi has never really goes away in the media.

Mike Blake/Reuters

Reality TV stars may come and go, but a new study suggests true fame is enduring.

The research finds that people who achieve real celebrity remain famous for years, making frequent appearances in newspapers over periods of decades.

The work bucks the widely held notion that fame is ephemeral, a belief held both by average individuals and by those who study the sociology of fame.

Story continues below advertisement

Eran Shor is an assistant professor of sociology at McGill University and is one of the authors of the study, which is published in the American Sociological Review.

He and his co-authors used large collections of newspaper archives that spanned decades to study the issue, looking at people in sports and politics and the field where fame is thought to be most fleeting, entertainment.

They found that even a dead celebrity like the eccentric billionaire Howard Hughes continues to feature in news articles long after his death.

"The large, large, large majority of people who get famous stay famous. For a long time. How long, it depends on how famous they got. But years – not 15 minutes, not 15 hours, not 15 days, not 15 months even," Shor says.

"We're basically coming out and saying not only is fame not (fleeting), it's extremely sticky."

Shor undertook the work with two colleagues from Stony Brook University in Stony Brook, N.Y., along with a software engineer from Google.

This portion of their ongoing work looks at figures in entertainment.

Story continues below advertisement

From a list of tens of millions of names that appeared in the entertainment sections of more than 2,000 newspapers between 2004 and 2009, a random sample of 100,000 names was drawn.

Some of those names would have belonged to non-celebrities – people who garnered one or two mentions. Others would be minor or moderate celebrities and still others real stars.

The names were then analyzed to see which appeared most often, with the top 10 from the sample selected for study. And then those names were tracked – going both forward and backward in time – to see if people who were frequently written about one year had sustained fame.

The top 10 included actors Jamie Foxx, Bill Murray, Natalie Portman, Tommy Lee Jones, Naomi Watts, John Malkovich, Adrien Brody and Steve Buscemi. Rounding out the group were music producer (and convicted murderer) Phil Spector and the late inventor and billionaire Howard Hughes.

Shor explains that these people aren't the most famous of the famous – another random selection of 100,000 names might have drawn up Brad Pitt, George Clooney or Jennifer Aniston. But of 100,000 names randomly drawn for this study, these 10 were the most frequently written about.

Four are Oscar winners (Foxx, Portman, Jones and Brody) and all are well known. Arguably none are among the super-elite of celebs, and yet their fame endures, Shor notes.

Story continues below advertisement

"Here's a group of people that are fairly famous, but perhaps not the most famous of them all – and all of them stick. All of them stay around from year to year. We know who they are, the papers keep writing about them, they stay in some kind of a celebrity (mode). They didn't go away."

Further, Shor and his colleagues found that 96 per cent of the people whose names were mentioned over 100 times in a year also written about at least three years before and would likely be written about in the next three years as well.

Report an error
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter