Skip to main content

The question

Is it true that serving white wine after red can upset your stomach and make you feel unwell?

The answer

Story continues below advertisement

I'm not aware of nasty bodily reactions arising simply because of wine-service order, though you might want to save Uncle Jimmy's homemade merlot until the paramedics arrive. The usual progression over the course of a multiwine meal flows from light whites to heavy reds. This is because heavier flavours tend to override and erase subtlety. It's just as in a typical meal, where lighter salads or fish dishes precede rich red meats.

On a gastric level (how's that for an appetizing expression?!), I've known people who find the higher acidity of most white wines to be jarring after, say, 6 p.m. So, they make the switch from white to red during the evening when they expect to be consuming more than a glass. But that acid intolerance has nothing to do with red-wine consumption earlier in the evening.

You might be interested to know that some wine experts in fact occasionally prefer to taste reds before whites, contrary to the usual order. I've travelled through Burgundy where, in particular, a few winemakers choose to present their red pinot noirs before hauling out the chardonnay-based whites. There's a sense that, because pinot is the star of the Burgundy show, particularly in the Côte de Nuits, it should be judged first and without bias. For a red grape, pinot also is light in tannins, the astringent red-wine compounds that might otherwise interfere with white wines later in the session. These winemakers argue that chardonnays, which are pretty full in body anyway, are easily able to follow pinot in the tasting progression and will presumably provide a fresh finish to the dégustation.

White after red? It's your choice – stomach willing.

E-mail your wine and spirits questions to Beppi Crosariol. Look for answers to select questions to appear in the Wine & Spirits newsletter and on The Globe and Mail website.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies