Skip to main content

Incoming Ontario premier Kathleen Wynne laughs as she speaks at her first formal press conference in Toronto on Sunday, Jan. 27, 2013.

Nathan Denette/THE CANADIAN PRESS

Craig and Marc Kielburger founded Free The Children and Me to We. Their biweekly Brain Storm column taps experts and readers for solutions to social issues.

We would never cheer for a tie game in hockey (especially now that our beloved Leafs are winning a few), but with Kathleen Wynne set to become Ontario's first female premier, equalizing the number of female and male provincial premiers at five each, we and many others celebrated the historic moment like an overtime goal (minus the blue-and-white face paint).

Yet just like the early weeks of a new hockey season, there's still a long way to go to achieve true gender parity in Canadian politics. From the way Parliament is scheduled and debate is structured, to the way political parties and the media operate, there remains a strong masculine narrative streaming through our political culture.

Story continues below advertisement

Levels of female representation in Canada's federal and provincial legislatures hover at only 25 per cent – short of the 30 to 35 per cent the United Nations says is required before changes in "management style, group dynamic and organization culture" take root. Sweden's national Riksdag is made up of 45 per cent women – attributed largely to its system of proportional representation, a more consensual political culture and family-friendly scheduling.

But where do we begin? Former Canadian prime minister Kim Campbell recently suggested a gender parity system where every riding elects two MPs – one man and one woman – thus guaranteeing half of our elected representatives in Ottawa are women.

This week's question: How can we further advance women's political representation in Canada?

The experts:

Maria Minna, former federal Liberal cabinet minister

"Nomination races can be very vicious and a deterrent to women's participation, in addition to the systemic and electoral barriers. We should consider legislation that compels parties to nominate 50 per cent women in winnable ridings, sets a quota of at least 40 per cent women in the House of Commons and a target date to achieve it, and requires Elections Canada to run parties' nomination processes."

Sana Hassainia, NDP member of Parliament (Verchères-Les Patriotes, Que.)

Story continues below advertisement

"Parliament is structured for those whose families no longer rely on them every day, but my young family cannot come after my work. Like all other workplaces, Parliament must account for the modern reality of the young working mother: time to pump milk for her child, and the parliamentary nursery could begin taking children under 18 months."

Melanee Thomas, professor of political science at the University of Calgary

"Canadians should critically examine when women are elected to lead their parties. Several, including Wynne, are selected when their parties' fortunes are dismal. This is called the 'glass cliff' phenomenon, and it highlights how parties are willing to select atypical leaders when the electoral risk is minimized."

Have your say in the comment section.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies