Skip to main content

Athletes who get sick less often win more medals, study finds

Data collected on Norwegian cross-country skiers demonstrate that small things matter when it comes to training.<137>LAHTI, FINLAND - FEBRUARY 21: (FRANCE OUT) Martin Johnsrud Sundby of Norway takes 1st place, Finn Haagen Krogh of Norway takes 2nd place, Hans Christer Holund of Norway takes 3rd place during the FIS Nordic World Cup Men's and Women's Cross Country Skiathlon on February 21, 2016 in Lahti, Finland. (Photo by Vianney Thibaut/Agence Zoom/Getty Images)<137>

Vianney Thibaut/Agence Zoom/Getty Images

At the loftiest echelons of sport, the margin separating the champions from the also-rans can be measured in milliseconds or in million-dollar endorsement deals – or in sick days.

That's one of the insights gleaned from a recent in-depth analysis of the training records of 37 elite Norwegian cross-country skiers over a nine-year period. The 16 athletes in the group who had won individual medals at the Olympics or World Championships reported an average of 14 days a year with symptoms of respiratory or gastrointestinal infection, compared with 22 days a year among the non-medalists.

In other words, if you keep getting the sniffles, you're less likely to climb onto the podium.

Story continues below advertisement

So how do you stay healthy while in training? The study, which was published online in March in the British Journal of Sports Medicine, uses the meticulous training records kept by the Norwegian national team to zero in on factors linked to higher or lower risk of illness, including air travel, training patterns and, of particular importance at this time of year, keeping your vitamin D levels up. Crucially, many of the factors are things you can control.

"I don't think it's entirely luck of the draw," says Ida Svendsen, a physiologist with the Norwegian Olympic and Paralympic Committee who led the study as part of her doctoral studies in exercise immunology at Loughborough University in Britain.

"I think the very best athletes are typically the ones who are most meticulous about pretty much everything – training, sleep, nutrition, hygiene."

One of the clearest patterns that emerged was the elevated risk of getting sick after air travel. Athletes were nearly five times as likely to report an infection the day after a flight, and the risk remained elevated for a week.

The stress of racing also raises infection risk, which makes the flight home after competition a potent one-two punch.

As a result, Svendsen says, Norwegian skiers are now advised to wait until the day after competition to fly home, "rather than jumping straight in a car to the airport after their last race."

A more surprising finding was that athletes with higher "training monotony," meaning that the intensity and duration of their training didn't fluctuate wildly from day to day, were less likely to get sick.

Story continues below advertisement

That doesn't mean that athletes should train the same every day, Svendsen cautions – after all, mixing hard and easy training days is a common piece of training advice. But it suggests that sudden increases in training load, or overly dramatic fluctuations from very easy to very hard, might put you at higher risk.

Another key factor was the time of year. The athletes were twice as likely to get sick during the winter, and when they did, the symptoms lasted longer than during the summer. That may seem obvious, but it's particularly interesting because it's the same pattern observed in summer athletes such as swimmers, even though their yearly training and competition calendars are reversed.

Skiers do their highest volume of training over the summer, and yet that's when they're least likely to get sick. That suggests the culprit is environmental factors, rather than training – and in particular, Svendsen and her colleagues point out, vitamin D levels may play a role. In fact, the highest risk of infection came in late winter and early spring, precisely when vitamin D levels are lowest in most people.

According to Neil Walsh, an exercise immunologist and head of the Extremes Research Group at Bangor University in Britain, there is mounting evidence that keeping your blood levels of vitamin D – or, strictly speaking, of a related marker called 25(OH)D – around 75 nanomoles a litre optimizes immune function in athletes and reduces the risk of respiratory tract infections. In contrast, a minimum level of 50 nmol/L is commonly recommended by bodies such as the U.S. Institute of Medicine.

To reach 75 nmol/L, Walsh and his colleagues suggested in a recent paper in Exercise Immunology Review that supplementing with 1,000 international units a day during the winter is a good idea. During the summer, on the other hand, getting about 15 minutes of unprotected sun exposure daily, between 10 a.m. and 3 p.m., is sufficient for most people.

"With adequate, safe summer sunlight exposure, there shouldn't be a need to supplement year-round," Walsh says.

Story continues below advertisement

Many of the other factors that contribute to infection risk are things we already know. "Hand hygiene is a big one," Svendsen points out, as well as basics such as getting enough sleep and staying hydrated. "These are all pretty common-sense things, but are sometimes overlooked."

If there is one thing we should take away from the Norwegian skiers' data, it is that these little things matter. Dodge a cold here, avoid a stomach bug there, and you might just make it to the podium.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter