Skip to main content

After breaking her leg in 2014, marathon runner Krista DuChene, left, found her already fit body recovered more quickly than expected.

Victah Sailer/Canada Running Series

Krista DuChene was already the second-fastest female marathoner in Canadian history when she fractured her thigh bone, a few hundred metres from the finish line of the 2014 Canadian Half-Marathon Championships in Montreal.

After hobbling to the finish, she was rushed to hospital for emergency surgery. She left with a plate and three screws in her left leg – and big question marks surrounding her hopes of competing in the 2016 Olympics. After all, it had taken years of hard training to get her marathon time down to 2:28:32, in her 10th attempt at the distance. How quickly could she return to form?

"The day after my surgery, I thought it would be two years," she admits. "Two days after my surgery, it changed to one year."

Story continues below advertisement

DuChene, a 38-year-old mother of three from Brantford, Ont., already had the experience of coming back from prolonged hiatuses after her pregnancies, so she had discovered an essential law of training: Once you've reached a certain level of fitness, it's easier to return to that level than it was to get there in the first place. This muscle memory is hardwired into our muscle cells, according to a series of recent studies – which should encourage avid exercisers to incorporate periods of recovery into their training, without worrying that they'll have to restart from scratch.

In 2010, researchers at the University of Oslo suggested muscle memory could result from the peculiar properties of muscle cell nuclei, the location where most of the cell's genetic instructions are stored. While most cells in the body have just one nucleus each, muscle cells are so big that they have multiple nuclei.

When you start training, your muscle cells get bigger and develop more nuclei. When you stop training your muscle cells get smaller again, but the Norwegian researchers observed that the extra nuclei persist long after training stops. Then, when you start training again, the nuclei are still there, ready to support re-expansion of the muscles.

The initial experiments were on mice and rats, but researchers estimate new muscle cell nuclei in humans have a half-life of at least 15 years, based on monitoring radioactive isotopes left over from above-ground nuclear testing, Dr. Kristian Gundersen, the lead author of the study, explained in an e-mail. "It's possible that they are more or less permanent once they are formed."

While that's good news from a fitness perspective, it also means that athletes who take performance-enhancing drugs may still have an unfair advantage even after serving a multiyear suspension. A follow-up study by Gunderson and his colleagues found that mice that had been given testosterone while training three months earlier still had 28 per cent more muscle-cell nuclei, and were able to gain muscle far more rapidly than control mice.

Gunderson and his colleagues also note the ability to generate new nuclei appears to decline with age. That suggests that getting as fit as you can while young will provide long lasting benefits as you age, making your muscles more responsive to training.

Muscle size isn't the only important training response. Endurance depends more on adaptations such as increased mitochondria, the cellular powerhouses that convert energy from food into a form that fuels efficient muscle contractions. At the annual meeting of the American College of Sports Medicine last month in San Diego, researchers from Temple University, led by Hojun Lee, presented preliminary results suggesting that, like muscle size, mitochondrial adaptations may also be influenced by the presence of additional nuclei.

Story continues below advertisement

As Lee explained, even though the mitochondria you gain in an initial bout of training gradually disappear when you stop, the genes that control the formation of new mitochondria are contained within the extra nuclei, which stick around indefinitely. So when someone such as DuChene starts training again after a long break, her muscle cells are already primed to begin producing more mitochondria.

While nobody hopes for a fractured femur, DuChene has come to see that breaks from her usual training routine have important benefits in allowing her body and mind to recover, and are less disruptive than you might expect. That's a lesson many of us neglect, either repeating the same training routine 52 weeks a year or achieving one fitness goal and launching straight into the next without a pause.

In the end, even DuChene's most optimistic predictions turned out to be not optimistic enough. In April, less than a year after her fracture, she ran 2:29:38 at the Rotterdam Marathon, her second-best time ever – and 12 seconds faster than the Canadian qualifying standard for next year's Olympics.

Alex Hutchinson blogs about exercise research at sweatscience.runnersworld.com. His latest book is Which Comes First, Cardio or Weights?

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter