Skip to main content

A Feb. 26, 2012, file photo shows Angelina Jolie arriving at the Academy Awards in Hollywood.

Chris Pizzello/AP

Writing about her decision to undergo a preventative double mastectomy, actress Angelina Jolie stressed, "I do not feel any less of a woman. I feel empowered that I made a strong choice that in no way diminishes my femininity."

Concerns about body image and the effects on sexual response can naturally arise for women undergoing the invasive procedure, from physiological questions about loss of feeling and pain from scar tissue to psychological apprehension around the consequences for pleasure.

"For most women, it's a very emotional decision," said Kelly Metcalfe, an associate professor at the University of Toronto's Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing.

Story continues below advertisement

Dr. Metcalfe, who researches cancer prevention in high-risk women, said some patients get feeling back and others do not. As for the fraught question of sexual pleasure, "Some women will tell you [breasts] have nothing to do with it. But for some women and their partners, it is a big part."

She acknowledged that while removing a breast "is not going to do anything to the way that you function as a human being, it does have an impact on the way you may perceive yourself as a woman."

When Amy Moore-Benson saw her breasts after reconstruction for the first time, "it was a massive sense of shock," said the Toronto literary agent and mother of three. "It was a very high price to pay. Still worth paying."

Ms. Moore-Benson, 44, underwent a double mastectomy after being diagnosed with aggressive breast cancer in 2008. Although her own appearance initially stunned her, Ms. Moore-Benson insists she did not grow self-conscious about it: She had no issues changing in the yoga studio or walking around nude in front of her husband at the time.

"I did not lose a piece of my sexuality with my breast. I did not ever see it like that, nor do I experience it like that now. ... It's my price that I had to pay to get out of being a cancer patient as quickly and effectively as I possibly could."

For women who decide to proceed with double mastectomies, such questions of body image often dim next to the prospect of a cancer-free life.

"These new breasts will not be the breasts that they've known their entire life. They will feel different, they will probably look different," Dr. Metcalfe said. "But we know that it has very beneficial effects as well. ... Women describe waking up from the surgery thinking, 'I no longer have to worry about breast cancer any more.' "

Story continues below advertisement

Aletta Poll, a genetic counsellor at the Women's College Research Institute's familial breast cancer clinic, said that despite generally good aesthetic results with modern mastectomies and reconstructive surgeries (procedures typically done in tandem in Canada), some patients "may not always be absolutely thrilled about the physical outcome." Asymmetry, shifting implants and keloid scarring are all issues, and Ms. Poll said patients do return to their reconstructive breast surgeons for certain fixes.

"This is not cosmetic surgery. This is not like a breast augmentation," Ms. Poll said. "I've had people who've gone back but I've not had them say, 'Man, do I wish I didn't do this.' "

Patients can approach their doctors about short-term psychotherapy and peer support, with some groups for carriers of the BRCA gene mutation even offering "touch and feel" show-and-tell sessions with facilitators who have undergone the procedure, Ms. Poll said.

Ms. Jolie also stressed the support of her partner, actor Brad Pitt. For women whose husbands aren't "that keen," Ms. Poll suggests bringing these spouses along to the doctor so they can hear "what exactly is at stake and get a better perspective."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies