Skip to main content

There is hope for change with a new imaging technique, often referred to as fusion biopsy, that links an MRI of the patient with images from a real-time ultrasound, allowing doctors to see suspicious areas better and target them for tissue sample testing. The development has the potential to help doctors identify aggressive forms of cancer, reduce the number of painful biopsy needles needed, and give men clearer answers sooner.

Thinkstock

One of the biggest challenges for urologists is distinguishing between low-risk prostate cancers and those that are aggressive enough to require treatment.

Now there is hope for change with a new imaging technique, often referred to as fusion biopsy, that links an MRI of the patient with images from a real-time ultrasound, allowing doctors to see suspicious areas better and target them for tissue sample testing.

The development has the potential to help doctors identify aggressive forms of cancer, reduce the number of painful biopsy needles needed, and give men clearer answers sooner.

Story continues below advertisement

And it could help reduce the number of treatments performed on men who face no imminent risk from prostate cancer, said Tony Finelli, a uro-oncologist at the Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre.

"We're trying to get out of the business of finding what someone would call insignificant, low-risk cancer," he said.

Typically, when doctors suspect a patient has prostate cancer, they take about 12 samples in an ultrasound-guided biopsy. But ultrasound cannot show the prostate in great detail, and the needles could miss cancerous areas, giving a "false negative" result. It is also painful for patients.

In fusion biopsy, an MRI gives a much more detailed picture. The radiologist flags areas of concern and the patient has an ultrasound in which the MRI image is fused aaonto the screen. This can help target areas to be biopsied, reduce the chance of a false negative, and could reduce the number of painful needles.

"It will be more effective. In other words, smaller cancer, early stage cancer will be more likely to be biopsied and diagnosed," said Aaron Fenster, chief scientific officer and director at the Centre for Imaging Technology Commercialization (CIMTEC). The centre has developed fusion imaging technology and has a spinoff company that is looking to market it.

Experts say the most reliable evidence shows that fusion biopsy is best for active surveillance – ongoing monitoring of patients who have had negative biopsies but still have elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels or other risk factors. This type of targeted screening can help reassure men who do not have an aggressive form of cancer – and help doctors spot those who do.

Rajiv Singal, a urologic surgeon at Toronto East General Hospital and assistant professor in the department of surgery at the University of Toronto, uses fusion biopsy and says it has great potential for active surveillance.

Story continues below advertisement

Diagnosing prostate cancer is not an exact science.

Doctors often test the blood for elevated PSA levels. But levels can rise for many reasons, and relying on it too heavily can lead to unnecessary tests, biopsies and treatment, and side effects such as incontinence and impotence. Last month, the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care released a statement arguing the risks of PSA tests outweigh the benefits. Doctors also use digital rectal exams to detect possible cases of prostate cancer, but they too can be unreliable.

Anoop Dogra, who lives in Toronto, was diagnosed with prostate cancer at 40 after a test showed elevated PSA levels and a biopsy confirmed the disease. He had surgery and recovered. He welcomes any development that could reduce the pain of a biopsy and provide more information to doctors and patients.

"If [the pain] can be minimized somehow … that would absolutely be helpful," he said.

Some companies are marketing fusion biopsy technology to health-care institutions. Dr. Singal said he and his colleagues have developed their own version, and he suspects that it will soon become the norm for active surveillance of prostate cancer.

Experts doubt it will become a standard front-line screening tool for prostate cancer because MRIs are expensive, waits can be long and the experts needed to interpret the results can be in short supply.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter