Skip to main content

How do you right an architectural wrong … twice?

In 1954, architect Sebastian Tauriello purchased Frank Lloyd Wright's self-described "opus," the five-building Darwin D. Martin house complex in Buffalo, N.Y., after the family abandoned it in 1937, thereby saving it from an undignified demolition-by-neglect. That Mr. Tauriello was forced to sell the rear of the site to raise funds – which resulted in the demolition of key structures in 1962 for the erection of low-rise apartment buildings – was no doubt painful, but necessary to restore the main house.

Today, the Martin House Restoration Corporation (MHRC) is putting the finishing touches on righting Mr. Tauriello's wrong.

Story continues below advertisement

As most architecture buffs in Southern Ontario know, Wright's 100-foot pergola, conservatory and carriage house have been painstakingly reproduced from original plans – with bricks manufactured in vintage "beehive" kilns and reproduction art glass windows – at a cost of millions upon millions of dollars. This, in turn, has spurred something of a posthumous Wright-building frenzy in Buffalo, as two unrealized projects have also been completed (not by the MHRC) in the past decade: the Fontana Boathouse on the Niagara River, designed for the University of Wisconsin in 1905, and Darwin Martin's Blue Sky Mausoleum at Forest Lawn Cemetery, designed in 1928.

This, understandably, has raised questions of authenticity and rebuilding vs. remembering in the architectural press.

But to step inside the entry hall of Mr. Martin's home, to allow one's gaze to travel past the massive fireplace to the long pergola is to remove all questions … and breath.

"So the Nike in the Louvre is about three feet taller," says MHRC director of operations Margaret Stehlik of the gleaming white exclamation point at the end of this awe-inspiring vista, a Winged Victory of Samothrace statue under the conservatory's apse. "It's so terrific that we were able to rebuild this so you can realize it in three dimensions instead of a photograph.

"It makes a big difference."

It sure does, and that's why all arguments to the contrary are irrelevant. Because Larkin Soap Co. executive Darwin Martin was one of the highest paid executives in the United States in 1903, Frank Lloyd Wright was able to fully realize the Prairie Style he had been distilling for a decade when he was handed the commission. He was also able to arrange the five structures – 15,000-square-foot main house, pergola, conservatory, carriage house/stable and a smaller house for Mr. Martin's sister and husband – into a vital composition within an equally curated landscape.

With the addition of Toshiko Mori's 2009 visitor's centre – a counterpoint to Wright with an inverted hip roof and transparent walls – and the acquisition in 2006 of the 1908 Gardener's Cottage – that composition is enhanced rather than diluted: The cottage offers the opportunity to see how Wright simplified the Prairie Style to inconspicuously tuck it between two Victorians over on Woodward Avenue; the visitors centre shows Ms. Mori's elegant restraint.

Story continues below advertisement

Of course, most visitors will come to see the main house, since it's considered by Wright scholars to be the best example of the Prairie Style in existence. The incredible amount of interior work currently taking place to ensure this title continues to stand is mind-boggling – "We have some phenomenal people working on this project," agrees Ms. Stehlik – since it reaches into every corner, from furniture reproductions by Timothy Coleman and onsite millwork by Steven Oubre (using expensive, quarter-sawn, old-growth white oak) or the recreation of the entire original kitchen to replace the 1950s-era yellow Formica one, to smaller items like doors and baseboards: "We have three-and-a-half miles of wood trim that needs to be reproduced," she says, raising her voice as circular saws whine out of sight, "and if one person was going to do it, it would take 30 years."

While Ms. Stehlik estimates that the main house is "85 per cent done," key pieces of art glass are still to come, including small casement windows on parts of the ceiling (it makes sense when you see it), and there are ongoing searches, such as the quest to find a glass artisan or jewellery maker capable of recreating the 15,000 pieces of mosaic tile – depicting a wisteria vine pattern – that once made the walls of the entry hall's two-sided fireplace glow as brightly as the fire.

The "most difficult part" of the project was recreating the conservatory, says Ms. Stehlik. It has smooth concrete with a "plaster-like finish," the trim work required century-old "sinker" cypress (i.e. logs brought up from the bottom of swamps) and the complex roof structure is made of copper-clad aluminum.

While "recreation" is uttered often at the Darwin Martin complex, at this level of craftsmanship it's not a dirty word. If anything, in (W)righting these past wrongs, Buffalo is showing the sort of leadership that all history and tourist dollar-loving cities should follow (and what city doesn't love those things?).

A walk through this home isn't just a walk though the Buffalo of the early 20th century, it's an understanding of the relationship between Mr. Wright and Mr. Martin, and, indeed, all those who have laid hands, and tools, to demolish, restore and rebuild it ever since.

"You have to be inside of architecture to actually get it," finishes Ms. Stehlik.

Story continues below advertisement

* * *

For information on tours, visit www.darwinmartinhouse.org

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter