Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](,dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

Architect Terrell Wong of Stone's Throw Design is certainly passionate when it comes to sustainable/green architecture. More recently, she's found a new – and related – love in the "very fledgling industry" based around the German Passive House movement, a relatively new, ultra-strict set of energy-efficiency guidelines first put to the test in Darmstadt in 1990.

While the Internet was full of international examples of Passivhaus Institut-certified buildings (and the U.S. equivalent, PHIUS), very few Canadian examples were floating around in cyberspace or elsewhere, so Ms. Wong, a co-founder and the first president of the non-profit Passive Buildings Canada, decided to write Passive Buildings in Canada.

"It's sort of like getting under the sheets and seeing what's going on," she says with a laugh. "I used my network to beg and plead everybody who is in the middle of a project, working too hard, to give me all the information they have."

Story continues below advertisement

And while it's not a huge book – she calls the slim 55-page hardcover "a snapshot" – each of the 13 projects profiled contain a few paragraphs of background information, technical specifications, a beautifully drawn section plan, and, perhaps most importantly, the names of the professionals involved. Large photos illustrate that a home built to Passive House standards can "be designed in any style, shape [or] form."

It's true: The first home featured, the Cook Residence, designed by Ms. Wong and built by Aerecura, has walls made of rammed earth (featured in Globe Real Estate in February, 2012), while a few pages over, a duplex in Whistler sports prefabricated wall panels. Further into the book, there is a straw bale cottage, and an Edmonton high-rise complex containing 209 units.

No matter how different the method of construction, however, each sips about one-tenth the energy of the average home. Speaking of which, how a home becomes a Passive House boils down to three main ingredients:

It allows 0.6 air changes per hour at 50 pascals (or less). To calculate this, a blower door test is conducted, whereby the home is depressurized and then repressurized to determine how much air leaves or enters via unseen points. "So it's really air-tight," offers Ms. Wong. "The new code this year I think has it around three or four changes per hour, but you're not required to test it, and most houses of 10, 20, 30, 40 [years] or older, those houses are probably 10-plus air changes per hour."

The home's heating or cooling load must be at or below 15 kilowatt-hours per square metre. "So, on average, a household would use between 100 and 150 kilowatt-hours per metre-squared, so it's one-tenth less than your average existing home." Newly constructed, non-PH houses, she adds, are "getting better."

The most important number is a home's primary energy load, which must clock in at 120 kWh per square metre or less. This includes energy lost during delivery. "For every kilowatt we use in a house," she explains, "we use at least another, if not two, for it to get here in terms of line losses and wastage and things like that." While clearly beyond the homeowner's control, "we can make a choice between one energy over another based on how much loss is between us and the primary source," Ms. Wong continues, "so either solar or, in some situations, natural gas makes way more sense than electricity."

To get a home Passive House-certified is a somewhat lengthy process. A preliminary construction design using PHPP software (Passive House Planning Package) is sent to a licensed PH examiner (there are many in North America) to get preconstruction approval. Then, after the home is built, there is on-site testing done to verify that the results match the estimates.

Story continues below advertisement

That's not to say retrofits of older homes can't qualify. On page 32, Ed Marion's Oakville home – once a 1950s one-storey brick bungalow and now an energy-saving two-storey superstar – proves that "anything is possible" with the right budget. And while retrofits are "more expensive by far than new builds," Ms. Wong says that in cases where a homeowner is planning to take things down to the studs during a renovation anyway, it only makes sense to shoot for Passive House qualification.

But, she cautions, the Passive House standard is not a be-all and end-all. Not all houses can face south for free solar heating, and many existing homes will never meet the rigorous requirements without sacrificing much of their architectural integrity.

"For my whole life I've been looking towards finding a way to get to lower energy, and this is just one of those ways," Ms. Wong finishes. "There're lots of energy efficiency programs across the world … but the path in which you go towards Passive House will be able to reduce your energy, and in my house it was 75 percent.

"So you can use that path to get to your own destination."

Passive Buildings in Canada can be purchased at or at Ms. Wong's website,

Story continues below advertisement

Editor's note: In the initial online version of this story the photo depicting the Whistler, B.C. duplex was incorrect. This version has the correct photo.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies