Skip to main content

Instead of deep basins, the high-end cleanse now involves glassy enclosures with ritzy finishes (slatted teak floors, for example), and a bevy of shower options – rain heads, steamers, massaging jets and hand-held spritzers.

Gaukhar Zh

Most kitchens are filled with "good idea" investments – those gadgets, tools and appliances that were a good idea in the store, but which collect dust most of the year because, let's face it, who's really going to scratch-make pasta, bread or Belgian waffles on a regular basis?

In the bathroom, the equivalent might just be the tub. Scheduling a moment to draw a bath, let alone soak in one, is a near inconceivable indulgence considering that most Canadians work such long hours (almost two-thirds of us put in more than 45 hours a week on the job, according to a 2012 study). And with our aging population, tubs are increasingly trip-and-slip hazards rather than relaxation devices.

In that sense, new survey results from Palo Alto, Calif.-based Houzz, an online, home-renovation community, are not surprising. Of the 7,645 Canadians and Americans who took the poll (all of whom either planning to or are currently remodelling a bathroom), 43 per cent said they are forgoing the tub, even in the master. Instead of deep basins, the high-end cleanse now involves glassy enclosures with ritzy finishes (slatted teak floors, for example), and a bevy of shower options – rain heads, steamers, massaging jets and hand-held spritzers.

Story continues below advertisement

Liza Hausman, Houzz's vice president of community, explains that " I was initially surprised by the results until I looked more closely at what's happening." The trend, she continues, is based on two factors. One is space. Many people are upgrading, though not enlarging, their bathrooms and would rather have a capacious walk-in shower over a small shower and a tub they won't use. The other is age. Homeowners 65-plus are the least likely to install a bath (59 per cent are opting out) because "getting in a freestanding tub can actually be quite tricky," notes Hausman.

Jennifer Simon, a Toronto-based interior decorator, agrees, adding that as people age, "they aren't just downsizing but also upgrading for more luxury."

She's currently consulting with a client who only wants a walk-in, spa-quality shower in his en suite. The reason, she says, is simple: "A spa shower adds a little bit of luxury to life everyday, whereas a soaker tub is much harder to carve out time for. … Most people never use theirs."

Simon also suggests that the features of a shower are more customizable, and therefore more "exciting," than a tub. The various independent controls can, say, turn on the rain faucet for a pleasant trickle as built-in wall jets pulse more forcefully at sore muscles.

Like Simon, Toronto-based interior designer Sara Bederman also notes that age is an important consideration when planning out a bathroom. Not just for the elderly, though, but for the very young as well.

Families with small children are cautious about going tubless because they don't want to let go of bath-time rituals, and some children dislike getting their face wet. Bederman counters that "kids, as long as they can stand on their own, usually over the age of two, love to splash and play in the jets." A bonus: "Their waterproof crayons are a lot easier to clean off a seamless glass enclosure than off white, grouted tiles."

Another important consideration, according to Bederman, is resale. The absence of a tub listed on the real-estate feature sheet might look odd to perspective buyers and agents.

Story continues below advertisement

Contractor Howie Track, a friend and colleague of Bederman's, is currently planning his own home, without a tub in his en suite. He's not worried about resale because he figures that in the coming years, roomy showers will become the norm, and because his focus is more on enjoying, rather than selling, his space. Besides, he points out, "without the tub, there's more room for the make-up counter that my wife will actually use."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies