Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

In April, 2012, in the Welsh port town of Caernarfon, a professional British soccer player named Ched Evans was convicted and sentenced to five years for rape. His victim, a local teenage girl, was deemed by the court to be too drunk to consent. Evans, a striker for Sheffield United who scored 35 goals in his last season, served roughly half his sentence and was released last October, a free man. But while Evans has paid his debt to society, he remains far from contrite. He still maintains he was wrongly accused and is working hard to get his verdict overturned.

Evans, who was signed into the Manchester City youth club when he was just 14, would like to play professional football again. Apart from working as a house painter during his stint in prison, it's the only job he's ever done and one he was very good at. Since his release, several professional teams have looked into signing him but have been scared off by public outcry and the threat of sponsorship withdrawal. Last week when the League One club Oldham Athletic seemed close to offering him a job, a petition opposing it gathered 30,000 signatures in a single day. So far, he remains unemployed.

Evans's story poses a difficult moral question: Should convicted felons return to high-profile positions once they have served the time for their crime? Does their continued fame effectively diminish the seriousness of their crime, or even glorify it?

Story continues below advertisement

The argument against allowing convicted felons to be celebrated in their fields occupies the fuzzy area of community values. Sure, Chris Brown might be a talented musician and Charlie Sheen a popular actor, but it's questionable whether we should look up to these men in light of their convictions for violent crime. We've forgiven Martha Stewart for insider trading but not Mel Gibson for his racist rants. As the celebrity-watcher Shinan Govani observed to me over e-mail this week, redemption after conviction is a tricky business for stars – one that is mostly based on the public's sense of betrayal over the perceived gap between perception and reality. "For every Halle Berry – who pleaded no contest in a hit-and-run, in 1997, and then won an Oscar – there's a Winona Ryder, who's never quite returned to the darling status she had prior to her shoplifting spree at Saks, and the publicity that followed."

These people have been tried and convicted and served the time handed down by the court of law, but the court of public opinion is often more mercurial.

While under Canadian law some convicted felons can be prevented from working in fields which might put them at risk to re-offend (most convicted pedophiles cannot work with children), most are free to pursue employment as they wish. But what if that employment might make them, well, famous?

Former media baron Conrad Black knows a great deal about the moral intricacies of being a convicted felon who earns his living in the limelight. Since serving five years in a U.S. prison after being convicted on fraud charges, he has continued to write books and publish essays and now hosts his own TV talk show. Asked about the issue of employment after incarceration, Black – who claims his conviction was a miscarriage of justice – was characteristically unrepentant, reminding me in an e-mail interview that "in general the idea of the criminal legal system is that when someone is convicted and has served the sentence, the matter is deemed to be closed. The sentence is not just the first instalment on a lifelong sequence of additional punishment that make it impossible for the individual to earn his livelihood in the manner in which he is qualified."

In the case of Ched Evans, he added, "I would be extremely cautious about attaching too much credence to the righteous pieties of observers and commentators and regulators of the game."

I tend to agree (with Conrad Black – I know!). I think it's unjust that Evans should be barred from professional sports because of public perception. He has served his sentence and should now be free to do any job he likes. At the same time I'm quite happy not to have to see the kids on my street wearing a jersey with his name on it. In essence: I vigorously defend his right, as a convicted rapist, to offend people like me by continuing to make millions and be publicly venerated as a professional athlete.

Some victim's-right organizations disagree. They argue that allowing convicts to be professionally visible could be detrimental to victims – particularly those who have suffered violent crime.

Story continues below advertisement

"It's a slap in the face to victims," says Bobbie McMurrich, director of Victim's Services Toronto, when convicted rapists (or even those just accused of alleged abuse, like Bill Cosby, Jian Ghomeshi or Ray Rice) are given high-profile employment. "It can send out a message that these sorts of crimes are not taken seriously – and certainly historically, violence against women in particular has not been taken seriously enough. Having an abuser in a public role means that their victim has a constant reminder and may be being revictimized every time they turn on the TV."

While McMurrich says she does believe in rehabilitation and the ability of abusers to change, that may not alter the experience for their victims. "If someone's been convicted of a violent crime then the public eye probably isn't the best place for them. Time for a career change, I'd say."

Toronto criminal lawyer Frank Addario would say second chances are vital, and that in fact, the good of society depends upon it. "Leaving aside cases where the felon is a danger, why shouldn't a bank robber be given a second chance? Our system of finite punishment is premised on the community getting its punishment, after which we invest in hope, redemption and rehabilitation. The alternative is to create an underclass of productive people who've made mistakes."

Addario points to none other than Conrad Black as a good example of someone who made a mistake, served his sentence, endured the collateral reputational harm and still has plenty to offer the community. "Role models who've made mistakes are just like role models whose mistakes are undiscovered," he says. "They are just a different teaching point."

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies