Skip to main content

U.S. actress and director Angelina Jolie arrives for the screening of the movie In The Land Of Blood And Honey at the 62nd Berlinale International Film Festival in Berlin in this February 11, 2012 file photo. Oscar-winning actress Jolie said on May 14, 2013 that she had undergone a preventive double mastectomy after finding out she had a gene mutation that leads to a sharply higher risk of both breast and ovarian cancer.

FABRIZIO BENSCH/REUTERS

In her op-ed in the New York Times, Angelina Jolie describes her decision as simple. "Once I knew that this was my reality, I decided to be proactive and to minimize the risk as much I could," she wrote. "I made a decision to have a preventive double mastectomy."

In her effort to spread awareness and encourage more women to seek out preventive treatment, Jolie paints a picture of her double mastectomy as relatively simple and pain-free. She includes some of the ugly details: of the "nipple delay" procedure, she described some pain and bruising, and of the major surgery, she wrote "it does feel like a scene out of a science-fiction film."

But after that, she wrote, you're back to "a normal life." For her kids, she added, "they see nothing that makes them uncomfortable. … Everything else is just Mommy, the same as she always was."

Story continues below advertisement

But was it really so easy? Others who have been through similar experiences suggest not.

In 2008, actress Christina Applegate, who, like Jolie, underwent a double mastectomy after testing positive for the BRCA1 gene mutation (which is linked to breast and ovarian cancer), told reporters at the time that the choice was "a tough one" to make.

"Sometimes, you know, I cry and sometimes I scream and I get really angry and I get really like, you know, into wallowing in self-pity sometimes," she said.

Journalist Lizzie Stark wrote of the psychological effects of losing her real breasts – something Jolie only glosses over. "I am not just losing my breasts, I'm losing the way my breasts look in my favourite shirt, the organs that make me a sexual, curvy woman, and I'm losing them unjustly at an age when most of my friends are getting engaged, married or pregnant," Stark wrote in 2010, just months before she was scheduled to have the procedure done.

And Guardian journalist Emma Gilbey Keller wrote of the toll the procedure had on her body afterward, including nausea, vertigo and an infection on one of her breasts. "None of it has been easy," she wrote. "I've been on anti-anxiety medication since I heard the word 'biopsy.' "

Like any surgery, there are risks to undergoing a mastectomy, including infection, fluid build-up at the surgical site, blood loss, blood clots and pain, according to FORCE, a non-profit dedicated to helping people cope with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. And because even the best surgeon will never be able to remove all breast tissue, a small risk of developing breast cancer anyway will always remain.

On top of that, there's the issue of access. Jolie wrote that, in the United States, the cost of genetic testing alone cost $3,000 (U.S.) – something which, she admits, "remains an obstacle for many women." (Here in Canada, it's less of an issue: In Ontario, for example, OHIP covers BRCA1 and 2 testing for women who are at risk for breast cancer).

Story continues below advertisement

All four women – Jolie, Keller, Stark and Applegate – say that, despite it all, they're glad to have had the surgery. "Most, even those who had surgical complications or developed a more negative body image, say they'd elect to have it again because it brought them peace of mind," a researcher at the Mayo Clinic Cancer Center told Shape Magazine.

But still, "I wish there had been another option, though," Keller wrote. "I wish there was a way of eliminating these cells without taking out so much of my body."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies