Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

For an exceptionally powerful woman in the public eye, Hillary Clinton has generally managed to avoid drawing attention to the minutiae of her appearance.

Except for her scrunchie habit, that is.

Scrunchies – in case you missed their ubiquity about two decades ago – are fabric-covered hair elastics that took on increasingly odious guises (beaded crochet, devore velvet, metallic satin) as the trend began its death rattle.

Story continues below advertisement

But the U.S. Secretary of State remains a scrunchie stalwart.

The fashion misstep is downright embarrassing for her aides, according to an Elle magazine story. In a new profile of Ms. Clinton, an anonymous State Department official explained that the dated ponytail holders help Ms. Clinton keep her hair looking tidy as she exits an airplane. But, the source added, "some of us are looking to ban the scrunchies."

Those are strong words for a hair accessory. Nevertheless, the topic has lit up the Internet faster than a foreign-policy debate.

After noting that a colleague had recently pilloried Ms. Clinton for her "egregious scrunchie wearing," Hilary George-Parkin at Styleite defended the Secretary of State's right to look like a Midwestern mom.

"This woman is out there representing America and championing the rights of women and children around the world. If she wants to do so in a scrunchie from time to time? So be it."

Others described Ms. Clintons's scrunchies as a fashion trademark – and even a sign of stability in uncertain times.

Commenting at Styleite, fustylite said she would hate to see Ms. Clinton ditch the pant suits and scrunchies. "HC is an icon of mine, and I think her style just shows that she's too damn important and busy to be bothered with shallow bs like stylists and hair dressers! Go Hillary!"

Story continues below advertisement

The sudden preoccupation over Ms. Clinton's hair proves the Democrats have finally wrestled attention away from the national obsession over Callista Gingrich's helmet head.

Moreover, Ms. Clinton's fondness for dated ponytail holders may, in the end, prove her to be a fashion visionary.

Eighties neon and jelly-bean-coloured jeans are all the rage, which means that nineties fashions – scrunchies included – may not be far behind.

What do you think of the proposed Hillary Clinton scrunchie ban?

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies