Skip to main content

People attend the 'We Are Ontario' rally organised by the Ontario Federation of Labour at Queen's Park in Toronto, April 21, 2012

MARK BLINCH/MARK BLINCH/REUTERS

We Canadians are a tough lot to please.

We whine about government spending – especially at tax time – even as we fight service cuts tooth and nail, says public policy professor Paul Kershaw at the University of British Columbia.

Nearly half of Canadians – 45 per cent – say government laws, services and programs are irrelevant to their well-being and quality of life, according to a national poll by McAllister Opinion Research.

Story continues below advertisement

Nevertheless, the same poll found that 90 per cent of Canadians are against cuts to services that support families with children, seniors, medical care, the environment and the poor.

The numbers show the disconnect between Canadians' political rhetoric and social spending priorities, Dr. Kershaw says.

"It has become trendy for Canadians to say that government doesn't matter," he says. "But nine in 10 Canadians want as much, if not more, spending on a variety of priorities."

Pity the politician who tries to give Canadians what they really want. Of 1,325 Canadians polled, 47 per cent say they would vote against any politician who wanted to increase taxes for any reason.

"Canadians haven't always been so unwilling to balance the country's chequebook," Dr. Kershaw says. "But since 2000, we've prioritized tax cuts to 'pay ourselves' first and foremost, while continuing spending."

On his blog, Dr. Kershaw refers to Canada as a "relatively low tax country by international standards." According to his analysis, Canadians pay $22-billion more now than we would if 1976 tax laws applied today. But he notes that over the same period, spending on medical care and pensions has increased by more than $80-billion a year – four times faster than the taxes that pay for them.

Meanwhile, south of the border, blockbuster author Stephen King is begging Uncle Sam to raise taxes to 50 from 28 per cent of his income – and do the same for the rest of the superrich.

Story continues below advertisement

There is, of course, a vast difference between government spending and gross misuse of taxpayer funds. (Minister of International Co-operation Bev Oda will be regretting that Savoy hotel bill and $16 glass of orange for some time to come.)

But the next time you crunch the numbers for Revenue Canada, it might help to remind yourself that the tax man giveth as well as taketh away.

Do you think Canadians pay too many taxes? If so, which areas of government spending would you cut?

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.