Skip to main content

Hanh Dinh and Lazaro Sopena on their wedding day in Miami Beach, 2011.

Jay Nguyen/Reuters

A wedding toast to Lazaro Sopena. The newlywed decided to take his wife's name – "an act of love," as he told Reuters – and in exchange the state of Florida decided to suspend his driver's licence for fraud, until it came to its senses.

As Sopena explains it, he wasn't all that attached to his own name. So after his wedding to Hanh Dinh, he got a new passport and Social Security card and amended his bank account accordingly – so that he could become Lazaro Dinh. Then he went to the Department of Motor Vehicles with his marriage licence and the $20 (U.S.) fee that a woman pays to change her name on her driver's licence, should she choose, after tying the knot.

A year later, he received a letter from the state accusing him of "obtaining a licence by fraud." The DMV said he would need to go to court and pay a $400 filing fee. But, wait, he was only changing his name because he had gotten married. The answer: "That only works for women."

Story continues below advertisement

Dinh's lawyers said: "Apparently the state of Florida clings to the outdated notion that treats women as an extension of a man." Turns out 41 states apparently feel the same way, a post in Frisky reports.

How crazy is that? Despite that famous line, a name isn't just a name – as many women who were forced to give theirs up will argue – but ultimately this is such a clear double standard, what else needs to be said?

Eventually, Reuters reports, the DMV relented, saying it had lifted the suspension of Dinh's license. "It was a mistake on our part," a spokesperson told Reuters.

Perhaps Dinh should try to recoup the cost of going without a driver's licence; he had to rely on drives from friends and his wife until the reinstatement. He may be a trailblazer in Florida, but this is a trail that shouldn't need blazing any more.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.