Skip to main content

An obese Ottawa man has lost custody of his two children, and one of the main factors in the judge's decision was the man's weight.

The 38-year-old father, who can't be identified under the Child and Family Services Act, weighs 380 pounds. Last year, when his children, age five and six, were taken from his ex-wife's house after an alleged overdose, he weighed as much as 525 pounds.

The two boys will now be put up for adoption.

Story continues below advertisement

The story of the custody battle, which has been emerging in media reports  in recent days, raises questions about the role an individual's weight plays in his or her ability to function, and at what point it becomes detrimental to taking care of oneself and others.

Of course, the man's weight was only one factor in the judge's decision. Media reports   indicate the man was, at one time, a chronic marijuana smoker, played video games for hours at a time, and once ran a marijuana grow-op.

But the judge noted the father never showed signs of abuse toward his children and that the man had achieved stability in his life.

The judge also said the man may need roommates in the future to help pay rent and that losing weight was a full-time endeavour.

The man has told several media outlets he is being discriminated against because of his weight and that he wants to go on a hunger strike to protest the decision.

It's a multi-layered story, but one question at the heart of it looms large: Should a person's weight have any bearing on his or her ability to parent?

Report an error
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter