Skip to main content

Cast member Rihanna poses at the American premiere of the Universal Pictures film "Battleship" in Los Angeles May 10, 2012

REUTERS

Yesterday, Nobody's Business, a new track by Rihanna featuring Chris Brown, was leaked online.

Hold on a second: What are they even doing recording a song together?

Has Rihanna completely forgotten that domestic violence episode from February 2009 when Brown, her boyfriend at the time, left her with visible injuries to her face?

Story continues below advertisement

Impossible.

So then maybe their volatile history is precisely the point.

The duo recorded a song together last year. Moreover, Rihanna continues to evade questions about whether they are back together.

It's no one's business; we get it. But then how do listeners reconcile their feelings about a seemingly abusive relationship with the fact that the duet is rather… likeable?

The beat is undeniably persuasive and the hook has earworm potential (when a song burrows inside your head). E Online has noted a Michael Jackson influence.

Is it possible to detach the song from the singers? And does liking the song mean turning a blind eye (or deaf ear) to domestic violence?

A comment on Idolator's post about the song suggests, "She can do what she wants – but waving it in our faces, in other victims [sic] faces, is just wrong."

Story continues below advertisement

Rihanna's new album is titled Unapologetic and she's never once portrayed herself as a victim. Playing the part of such a tough girl somehow glosses over the seriousness of their history.

So far, neither artist has commented on the song. And it's not even clear whether they actually recorded it together. But if all of this was pushed upon Rihanna by some record exec, then the pop star is being victimized beyond the bruises and busted lip.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies