Skip to main content

Woe to the British six-year-old whose parents sent him to school with cheese crackers. His punishment: four days suspension.

According to a story in The Guardian, the primary school student was sent home after teachers discovered a bag of Mini Cheddars in his lunch, and his parents were found in violation of the school's health and balanced meal policy.

This lack of parental support, the newspaper reported, quoting a letter sent to his family, "had led to Riley being put in a situation where he is continuously breaking school rules regarding health eating."

Story continues below advertisement

And so the rabid controversy over kids' lunches continues.

Last November, a Winnipeg daycare threatened a mom with a fine because she had failed to include a "grain" in her child's balanced lunch, which included, incidentally, roast beef, potatoes, carrots and an orange for dessert.

And last week, officials in Ohio had to apologize after a cafeteria worker seized the meals of a group of elementary school students whose lunch accounts were in arrears. Instead the kids were given an orange and a small carton of milk, while their actual lunch was tossed in the garbage. The case made national news in the United States, and lunch lady has been placed on leave.

Between allergy restrictions and health eating campaigns, packing the old brown bag has never been so complicated.

For the record, officials at Riley's school in Britain say that only one family – that is his – has complained about the policy, saying the response from the others has been "wonderful."

But Riley's parents aren't backing down. "We just do not see how they have a right to tell us what we can feed our son," says his mom, Nicola Mardle. "If anything, Riley is underweight and could do with putting on a few pounds."

It's not clear what else was in his lunch, but those "Baked Mini Cheddars" sound an awful lot like Goldfish crackers, minus the marine theme. If adding those to the lunch bag were grounds for suspension, Canadian schools would have solved the class-size problem.

Story continues below advertisement

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.