Skip to main content

Seventeen magazine

Wire Image/NYT

Seventeen magazine took a step forward in the debate over digitally altered photos by declaring it will never change girls' faces or body shapes from now on.

The decision comes after months of pressure from a viral online petition started by 14-year-old Julia Bluhm in April. The petition, which asked the magazine to print one unaltered photo each month, attracted nearly 85,000 signatures.

In a letter to readers that will appear in the magazine's August issue, editor-in-chief Ann Shoket said  the entire staff of the magazine had signed a pact, which includes a pledge to "celebrate every kind of beauty" with a range of body types, skin tones, heights and hair textures. The magazine will also post details of some photo shoots to its Tumblr site, including what elements of photos are changed before they go to print (eliminating a piece of flyaway hair or a big fold in a piece of clothing, for instance).

Story continues below advertisement

Many people took to social media to praise Seventeen's decision, saying it's a big step forward and will help prevent the practice of promoting unrealistic body types, so common in the pages of magazines (even those aimed at men).

Katie Couric tweeted she was "Happy to see Seventeen mag is going anti-airbrush, hope more continue to follow" while Dan Cooke, a weather anchor in Hawaii, tweeted "As the father of a teenage girl, a sincere thank you" to the magazine for their decision.

But some commenters, such as those on the New York Times Facebook site said the policy discriminates against naturally attractive women and that it's just sour grapes by the unattractive.

Do you think this decision is a move in the right direction?

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies