Skip to main content

Stock photo | Getty Images | Comstock/Stock photo | Getty Images | Comstock

Well, if Forbes columnist Gene Marks was hoping for close to half a million page views and thousands of comments – and slams – this was one way to do it.

In a post titled " If I was a poor black kid," the self-described "short, balding and mediocre public accountant" (who is also white) opined on how disadvantaged inner-city black kids in his hometown, Philadelphia, might turn their luck around.

In addition to getting the best grades possible and learning to "be able to read sufficiently," Mr. Marks said he would "use the technology available to me as a student." He wrote that he knows "a few school teachers and they tell me that many inner city parents usually have or can afford cheap computers and internet service nowadays."

Story continues below advertisement

Then, he said he'd use the free technology available to study: "I'd become expert at Google Scholar. I'd visit study sites like SparkNotes and CliffsNotes to help me understand books. I'd watch relevant teachings on Academic Earth, TED and the Khan Academy."

The goal? To nab a spot at an elite magnet school or private school – whose admissions staff have scholarships to hand out – and to eventually learn how to write software, thus acing the world of technology.

But by this point, Mr. Marks had lost most readers.

Baratunde Thurston, a comedian and director of digital for The Onion who has written the book "How To Be Black," couldn't resist joining a number of other critics in writing back to Mr. Marks. His retort is in the voice of a "poor black kid."

"Thank you Mr. Marks. You have changed everything about my life. Thanks to your article, I worked to make sure I got the best grades, made reading my number one priority and created better paths for myself. If only someone had suggested this earlier," he wrote.

"I took more of your advice. I got 'technical.' I had no idea I could get technical. I learned software!"

Aside from Mr. Mark's ham-fisted attempts to dole out advice, is there an argument to be made that more underprivileged kids should have access to computers and wireless internet connections? Or is Mr. Mark's focus on technology missing the point?

Story continues below advertisement

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.