Skip to main content

Bullying is perhaps the single largest problem facing kids today: You don't have to look very far, or search the Internet very hard, to find proof of recent tragedies.

There are proposed legislations, grassroots YouTube campaigns, endorsements from celebrities, even a Facebook tool to try to solve this problem that's claiming too many innocent lives.

That's why it's so very appalling that the Alberta School Boards Association has rejected a proposal that would protect gay students and staff from discrimination - the same proposal that was passed by Edmonton Public Schools last year.

Story continues below advertisement

In fact, 62 per cent of the board turned down the proposal, and one trustee from Pembina, Alta., said some shockingly ignorant things to the CBC.

Dale Schaffrick suggested if "children with a gay tendency" could hide their gayness it would be "for their own benefit."

Unsurprisingly, the reaction on Twitter has been less than kind to Shaffrick and the hashtag #actlessgay has taken off.

"Dear Dale Schaffrick, can you please 'act less bigoted'? Or better yet, just resign," tweeted one. "Dale Schaffrick shame on you," said another. Jeff Johnson, Education Minister in Alberta, tweeted, "As a parent I would never ask my child to hide who they are."

In a letter to the ASBA, Edmonton-based gay activist Murray Billet took Shaffrick and his colleagues to task, asking them to move in to 2012.

"I can tell you that comment is homophobic," Billett said in an interview with CTV News. "To suggest that one minority group should act, dress or behave in a different way so they don't get bullied."

Schaffrick has apologized, telling CTV that his comments "were inappropriate and they were offensive, and I apologize for that."

Story continues below advertisement

But we still wonder if the motion will be reconsidered.

And, even more, why would anyone think - let alone publicly say – such insensitive sentiments in the face of such a national crisis?

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.