Skip to main content

When a restaurant advertises it's all-you-can-eat, does it really mean all you can eat?

Apparently, no. As George Dalmon and Andy Miles discovered, there is a limit, especially if you eat as much as they do. The two British men have been banned from Gobi restaurant in Brighton, England, after the owner accused them of being "a couple of pigs," according to The Telegraph.

As The Telegraph reports, the Mongolian barbecue restaurant invites customers to assemble dishes from its buffet "as many times as you wish," for 12 GBP, or about $19. But the manager, who declined to be named, told the newspaper the pair had been taking advantage of the deal for two years, and were eating the restaurant out of business.

Story continues below advertisement

"Basically, they just come in and pig out," the manager said, adding that the two diners habitually clear out the buffet before other customers have a chance.

Dalmon defended himself, saying the restaurant's bowls are so small, they have to keep going back for more to satisfy their appetities. He added the owner "went absolutely mental" when he notified them they were banned. "He said we were a couple of pigs and we were banned for life. I couldn't believe it," he told The Telegraph.

While online commenters debate whether the restaurant should uphold its all-you-can-eat promise, it may be worth questioning the merits of all-you-can-eat in the first place.

First, as Martin Caraher, professor of food and health policy at City University London, pointed out to the BBC, the all-you-can-eat model, which emerged out of the U.S. during the 1930s, encourages demand for "big portions, rubbish food."

"What we actually need is higher quality and people eating less," he said.

(A recent anti-obesity ad out of Minnesota was criticized for being too harsh, but its message – carried by two children boasting of how much their fathers can eat – does have a point. Is gorging really something to be proud of?)

Moreover, from an economic perspective, all-you-can-eat doesn't make a whole lot of sense. As Forbes magazine explained , it forces restaurants to set their price above what average customers eat. In theory, this then creates a vicious cycle, whereby anyone who eats less than what they're asked to pay no longer finds it a good value.  Thus, only customers who eat more than the stated price will dine there, skewing the average all over again.

Story continues below advertisement

"This process continues, until there is only one guy left going to the buffet, and he eats $300 worth of fish and is charged exactly $300 for it." Forbes contributor Adam Ozimek, wrote. "In effect, this theory says that all-you-can-eat buffets should not exist."

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies