Skip to main content


Take a close look at what your teenage daughter is wearing this morning as she heads out the door. You may thank heavens she's modestly dressed, and her outfit is appropriate for school. But are you sure it'll stay that way once she's out of your sight?

According to the Los Angeles Times, British schools have been struggling against "hemline creep," the age-old phenomenon where girls cinch their uniform skirts at the waist to shorten them to more revealing lengths (usually once they're within a safe distance from home). Now, tired of rebuking their pupils for hemline creep, some schools are taking the drastic measure of banning skirts altogether, in favour of trousers.

The ban is meant to prevent the sexualization of girls at increasingly younger ages, the L.A. Times reports. One headmaster said girls were wearing skirts "almost like belts," while another worried their attire could prompt "inappropriate thoughts" among the boys.

Story continues below advertisement

Unlike in North America, school uniforms are the norm in the United Kingdom. Nevertheless, some parents and girls feel the latest measure has taken dress code regulations a step too far, complaining that they'd like to have a choice between trousers or skirts.

Moreover, trousers don't necessarily ensure modesty. The L.A. Times points out that headmaster David New caused some grumbling two years ago when he banned trousers by the clothing label, "Miss Sexy," which were reportedly tight and low on the hips.

"Staff were becoming embarrassed by seeing too much of the girls instead of the uniform," Mr. New explains.

He acknowledges, however, that it's an unending battle, trying to regulate what his pupils wear.

"I suspect that, teenagers being teenagers, there will be a new uniform violation that becomes the habit," he says. "That was true when I was at school, and I'm sure it was true when my father was at school."

Is it possible to control what teens wear, and how they wear it?

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter