Skip to main content

A security guard stands on duty after the opening session of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference in Beijing's Great Hall of the People, China, Thursday, March 3, 2011.

Ng Han Guan/AP/Ng Han Guan/AP

Stock photography databases? It's time to change your game plan. The early middle-aged caucasian male with brown hair should no longer be the go-to "average guy." At least, not if you're catering to a global market.

According to National Geographic, the most typical-looking person in the world is a 28-year-old Han Chinese man.

The magazine spent a year researching world populations and, after calculating the world's more predominant sex (male), median age (28) and largest ethnic group (Han Chinese), researchers analyzed 190,000 faces to create a composite of the "the world's most typical person" (and yes, yes, we know the method they used to create the composite might not be truly scientific in your view).

Story continues below advertisement



In two decades, Mr.28-year-old-Han-Chinese-Man will be replaced with another composite. Demographers guess that by 2030, that title of "most typical" will go to someone from India.



It's around that time (2031 to be exact, according to projections from Statistics Canada) that visible minorities in Canada will make up one-third of the country's total population. In keeping with National Geographic's predictions for world population growth, South Asians will be the most predominant faces among visible minorities.

Istanbul-based photographer Mike Mike had the same idea as National Geographic when he created Faces of Tomorrow, a photo project that shows "the face" of cities around the world using composite photos of individual residents. Click through to see how immigration patterns have changed "the face" of a city such as Amsterdam.

Report an error
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.