Skip to main content
Welcome to
super saver spring
offer ends april 20
save over $140
save over 85%
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks
Welcome to
super saver spring
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Parents and other adults may naturally want to heap praise on kids with low self-esteem, but telling little Billy that he's incredibly great might actually do more harm than good.

In a new study to be published in the journal psychological science, researchers found that kids with low self-esteem who receive inflated praise often shrink from tackling new challenges as a result.

"Inflated praise can backfire with those kids who seem to need it the most, kids with low self-esteem," Eddie Brummelman, lead author of the study, said in a release.

Story continues below advertisement

Just what counts as "inflated" praise? For Brummelman and colleagues, regular praise could be something such as, "You're good at this," while inflated praise included the addition of adverbs such as "incredibly" or adjectives such as "perfect."

As the researchers found, adults show a natural tendency to use inflated praise when dealing with kids with low self-esteem. In fact, we'll give low self-esteem kids about twice as much inflated praise than we give to kids with high self-esteem, according to one of the studies Brummelman and his colleagues conducted.

"Parents seemed to think that the children with low self-esteem needed to get extra praise to make them feel better," Brad Bushman, a professor of communication and psychology at Ohio State University and co-author of the study, said in the release.

"It's understandable why adults would do that, but we found in another experiment that this inflated praise can backfire in these children," he said.

In that study, 240 kids were tasked with drawing van Gogh's painting Wild Roses. They then received no praise, non-inflated praise or inflated praise in a note from someone identified as a professional painter.

Then, the children were told they could draw a picture that was easy to re-create "but you won't learn much," or more difficult images which "you might make many mistakes, but you'll definitely learn a lot too."

Kids with low self-esteem were more likely to choose the easy option.

Story continues below advertisement

"If you tell a child with low self-esteem that they did incredibly well, they may think they always need to do incredibly well. They may worry about meeting those high standards and decide not to take on any new challenges," Brummelman said.

So what are parents to do? We all want to praise our kids, after all.

It might be better to focus on effort instead of results, previous research has shown.

In a study published last year in the journal Child Development, Stanford psychology professor Carol Dweck found that when mothers praised the effort as opposed to talent of their kids, who were one to three years old, then five years later those children showed more motivation and more positive attitudes toward challenges.

"It's better to focus on effort and the action your baby is doing. 'You worked hard on that,' versus 'you're so good at that," Dweck said in a release.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies