Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Wait a minute, wait a minute. Women can't break the glass ceiling because of, er… what?

According to The Telegraph, one of the first witnesses in a British government inquiry into sexual discrimination against women in the workplace says women have trouble making it at the top because men and women interact through "sexual display" in the boardroom.

Independent researcher Steve Moxon told the members of Parliament that this involves men showing off their competitiveness, while women "back off."

Story continues below advertisement

"You must start from the biology. The basis of the biology is, 'Is there a difference between the sexes?' You are damn right there is," Moxton is quoted in The Telegraph as saying. "Males compete with other males to sort out the men from the boys as it were; females, preferentially, sexually select the highest-status males, i.e. the males of a higher rank in the male dominance hierarchy."

The workplace, he adds, "is a hierarchy for obvious reasons that we do not need to go into. Males fit into that very well. Females obviously do not."

Even more explosive is Moxon's claim that "it is no surprise that women have difficulty in the workplace. Not only do they have difficulty; they do not want to be in it in the first place." (Anyone care to object?) He argued that his theory on mating rituals is the main reason why the government will never succeed in increasing the ratio of male to female board members of listed companies to 50:50 from its current 10:1.

The Telegraph describes Moxon as a "self-described academic" and the author of an "antifeminist" book, titled The Woman Racket.

Maybe things work a little differently in the boardrooms where Moxon has worked, but if your own company's boardroom is an arena for "sexual display" and mating rituals, you may want to alert your human resources department.

There are, of course, numerous reasons why women are still underrepresented in executive positions. Among them are conflicting attitudes about how women should balance their home and work lives. Just look at the tough spot in which Yahoo's chief executive Marissa Mayer found herself when she took a two-week maternity leave (which critics deemed too short) and went on to spark another firestorm for describing her baby as "easy."

While many have chastised Mayer for setting unrealistic expectations for women in the workplace, no doubt she is also under pressure to prove she is well capable of running the company, regardless of what the Moxons of the world may believe.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies