Skip to main content

Rather than bash them, Boris Johnson argues, “we should be offering our humble and hearty thanks” to the very wealthy.

TOBY MELVILLE/Reuters

The Mayor of London would like you to be kind (and give thanks) to the next super-rich person you meet.

You will know them because, by Boris Johnson's own description in a recent column in the Daily Telegraph, they never wear the same shirt twice, have servants to rub their temples with eau de cologne, and have the hard task of picking out the just-right McLaren supercar for their kids' 18th birthday present.

As mayor, Johnson says, it's "his duty" to defend the "put-upon minority – from the homeless to Irish travellers to ex-gang members." And don't those "zillionaires" we all envy deserve the same protection from prejudice and inequity?

Story continues below advertisement

After all, they aren't any happier than the rest of us, Johnson claims. (Those private jets and personal chefs are so high-maintenance. Really, homelessness is just the simpler life.)

Rather than bash them, he argues, "we should be offering our humble and hearty thanks." After all, they are feeding the rest of us with their tax contributions. "These are the people who put bread on the tables of families who – if the rich didn't invest in supercars and employ eau de cologne-dabbers – might otherwise find themselves without a breadwinner."

Who knew there was such opportunities for "eau de cologne dabbing" in England? Those of us who fall outside the definition of "super-rich," can be excused for gagging at the notion of humbly offering our gratitude to our wealthy overlords (are we to get on our knees for that?). And with all the stories of corporate fraud and fat-cat-salaries, to say nothing of those families left jobless and homeless, the notion that we should reserve sympathy for people who don't, as Johnson puts it, "pick up their own socks," is cringe-worthy.

Needless to say, Johnson's argument didn't go over well with Daily Telegraph readers, who immediately began questioning his math about the amount of taxes the wealthy actually pay. "Do you have a few crumbs for me and the missus, m'lord?" a reader wrote online.

But the column does point to a more important discussion, one the Occupy Wall Street movement attempted to start: What is the responsibility of the super-rich (or the just average rich) in our society? How much should we worry about the growing gap between the rich and poor, and what it means for future generations? The Globe has been exploring the issue of income-equality with this multipart series.

Closer to Johnson's privileged neighbourhood, former British prime minister John Major last week criticized what he called the "truly shocking" privilege of privately educated affluent people who dominate "every single sphere of British influence." Major argued that for citizens with only a public education in Britain, hard work was not enough today to get them into places of influence of power.

Let's see: social mobility, the long-term impact of poverty on children and families, the growing wage gap. Maybe, Mayor Johnson, after society has "humbly thanked" the poor little rich tycoon with a maid to clean his silver spoons, we might turn our attention to those issues.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies