Skip to main content

Alberta Premier Jim Prentice and former Wildrose leader Danielle Smith speak to media after a caucus meeting in Edmonton on Dec. 17, 2014.

JASON FRANSON/THE CANADIAN PRESS

Former Wildrose leader Danielle Smith issued an apology to her constituents Saturday saying she should have waited to hear from Albertans before she and other caucus members crossed the floor to join the governing Progressive Conservatives.

Smith took to Facebook on Saturday to say she's "sorry" that she "did not take more time to allow Albertans to consider and debate the idea of reunification before Wildrose MLAs joined the PC Caucus."

She went on to state that in hindsight, "it is clear that there needed to be more engagement and discussion to prepare Albertans for this change."

Story continues below advertisement

"It has not gone as expected. It has not been an easy path. It has angered a lot of people," Smith stated in the post.

"For that I am truly sorry."

In December, Smith led eight of her MLAs across the floor to join Premier Jim Prentice's government, leaving just five Wildrose members to be the official Opposition.

Smith told reporters in High River Saturday that she misread how angry the public was going to be after moving so quickly to join the government.

"I blame myself for that. I think I misunderstood just how angry people would be. I have to take responsibility for the fact people were surprised...it was unexpected. But in the end there were just certain factors that we had to deal with," Smith said.

She said the move had to be approved by the government caucus and the next meeting after December wasn't until Jan. 28. Smith said Prentice also made it clear that he wanted to start the nomination process in January.

Smith said she has no regrets about crossing the floor and that she will seek the PC nomination for Highwood in southern Alberta, the seat she currently holds.

Story continues below advertisement

"I did what was best for my constituents. You make tough decisions sometimes. Not every decision is a popular one," Smith said.

"I will be running and seeking the nomination. I will leave it to our members to decide what they think of the decision in the next election."

Smith said in the Facebook post that it became clear to her at the Wildrose annual general meeting last fall that the membership was more interested in being a protest party than becoming government.

Reaction to the post ranged from supportive to angry.

"This isn't an apology. You are blaming WRP membership. Because of you we are going to have higher income taxes or a PST," Craig Smith commented below the post, making reference to Prentice's suggestion earlier this month that Alberta should discuss the introduction of a sales tax.

"If we get a PST they should call it the DST (Danielle Smith Tax)," he added.

Story continues below advertisement

David Evans, however, was sympathetic on Smith's views about where Wildrose was headed.

"I believe the WRP, whom I supported, went way off side at the AGM, failed to be seen as anything other than a redneck right wing gong show, and as such I understand the defection to the Conservative party," Evans posted.

Smith said in the post that she had hoped that the Wildrose executive committee would put a motion for unification with the Tories to a vote of the entire membership, but she said they chose not to.

She said that after nearly six years of attempting to create a fiscally conservative and socially mainstream party, Wildrose members rejected that path.

"Being an 'NDP of the right' was never the type of movement I wanted to lead," Smith stated.

Smith also noted in High River on Saturday that she discussed with her former caucus members how falling oil prices made it unrealistic to expect the government to maintain the status quo.

"I just said when we have $50 oil it just frankly is dishonest to tell Albertans that we can balance the budget without raising taxes, without going into debt and to pay off debt. I was very clear that we couldn't continue on with the other hat I was wearing, taking that decision," she explained.

"It's just frankly not possible to find $7 billion worth of savings within the current budget."

The nine defectors have been criticized for abandoning their duty for personal gain, and one of them, Rob Anderson, said he won't run in the next election.

Earlier this month Suzanne Oel, president of the Progressive Conservative association in Highwood, said a number of people have expressed interest in running for the party, but she wouldn't say how many.

Report an error
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter