Skip to main content
// //

Collet Stephan, second from left, wipes away a tear as she and her husband David Stephan arrive at the courthouse with their children in Lethbridge, Alta., on June 24, 2016.

Jeff McIntosh/THE CANADIAN PRESS

Some experts worry the continuing legal saga of a southern Alberta couple convicted of failing to get proper medical treatment for their son who died of bacterial meningitis could turn them into martyrs for the alternative medicine and anti-vaccination movement.

Tim Caulfield, the research director of the University of Alberta's Health Law and Science Policy Group, said he worries about David Stephan's continued public statements he and his wife were targeted because they didn't vaccinate their children.

"I hope we don't have that incredible polarization but that could be one of the downsides of this whole event — this couple being viewed almost as a martyr for the alternative practitioner side of the story," said Caulfield.

Story continues below advertisement

"It almost doesn't matter if we think David is a credible source of information. It almost doesn't matter if he has something insightful to say. The problem is he keeps the narrative alive. He helps to keep the myth alive."

David and Collet Stephan were found guilty by a jury in April of failing to provide the necessaries of life to 19-month-old Ezekiel. Their trial was told they treated the boy with hot pepper, garlic, onions and horseradish instead of taking him to a doctor, and only called an ambulance after he stopped breathing in 2012.

David Stephan received a four-month jail term and Collet Stephan was handed three months of around-the-clock house arrest.

Both the Crown and defence recently filed appeals and the couple was released on bail Thursday.

Before sentencing, David Stephan was interviewed by the producers behind "Vaxxed," a controversial documentary alleging a link between the MMR vaccine and autism.

He claimed it was a parental rights issue and said it comes down to whether "we have the right to vaccinate or not vaccinate without being held liable." In delivering the sentence, Justice Rodney Jerke criticized the father for his "lack of remorse" and said he seemed more concerned about being punished than about his inaction when his son was sick.

The Stephans also had a significant number of backers turn up for their court appearances, and a website offering them support had many followers.

Story continues below advertisement

"If you're part of the anti-vaccination community you've bought into all of the conspiracy theories — that there's someone pulling the strings and withholding the actual data," said Caulfield, author of the books "The Cure for Everything! Untangling the Twisted Messages about Health, Fitness and Happiness" and "Is Gwyneth Paltrow Wrong About Everything?"

"We shouldn't test our ideologies on our children and that seems to be what kind of played out here. They were going to take their ideology right to the wall and unfortunately it resulted in a horrible conclusion."

University of Calgary bioethicist Juliet Guichon is still hopeful that some in the anti-vaccination movement can be persuaded to change their views.

"There's a small group of parents who probably will never consent to vaccination. Their position is rigid but that's a small percentage and the rest of the population can be stratified into what types of communication they require," she said.

"I think communication makes a big difference to people who may believe that Mr. Stephan is a hero."

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies