Skip to main content

British Columbia Anesthesiologist staffing not a factor in B.C. stillbirth case, review finds

One month after a Victoria doctor said a stillborn baby's death was due to a shortage of anesthesiologists, an independent review has found anesthesia coverage was not a factor in the case.

The infant was delivered by an emergency cesarean section on Aug. 9 at Victoria General Hospital, the primary care centre for high-risk pregnancies on Vancouver Island.

Doctor Sue Ferreira, an anesthesiologist herself, said the lack of an anesthesiologist could have caused a delay in care, which could have resulted in the death of the baby.

Story continues below advertisement

But in a review released Monday, an external medical team shot down that claim and said care was provided within time guidelines.

"After examining the case detail the review team was quite satisfied that there was no delay in the provision of anesthesia care to the patient," Dr. Ward Flemons, a professor of medicine at the University of Calgary, wrote in a statement. "Although for a short period of time the anesthesiologist was responsible for two patients, which although not an ideal situation, did not have any untoward impact on either patient."

The review was commissioned on Aug. 19, shortly after concerns about the baby's death were publicly raised.

The report said once the decision was made to proceed with a cesarean section, "the patient was quickly transferred a short distance to the main operating room" and "met by the onsite anesthesiologist and a fully prepared OR staff." The report said the cesarean section began 20 minutes from when it was called, which is within the guideline of 30 minutes.

In addition to its findings on the baby's death, the review team made 20 recommendations on how to enhance fetal care services at Victoria General.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter