Skip to main content

Markus Mauthe/Greenpeace

An environmental group has withdrawn from a conservation pact with Canada's forestry industry, saying little has been accomplished after nearly three years of talks aimed at protecting trees and caribou in the boreal forest.

Vancouver-based Canopy, a not-for-profit organization that supports environmentally friendly paper, said on Wednesday that it had high hopes when it helped to forge the Canadian Boreal Forest Agreement (CBFA). Canopy's decision to withdraw comes four months after Greenpeace Canada pulled out of the conservation pact, which is meant to serve as the framework for companies and environmentalists to spell out specific areas off limits to logging.

Seven environmental groups remain at the table with 19 companies in the forestry sector in the quest to determine ecologically sensitive areas of Canada's boreal, or northern, forests.

Story continues below advertisement

Canopy executive director Nicole Rycroft said she is disappointed by the absence of any major breakthrough since nine environmental groups signed the CBFA on May 18, 2010, with members of the Forest Products Association of Canada.

"We had thought of this and hailed this as a game-changer, but at some point you need to step back and acknowledge that it hasn't worked out," Ms. Rycroft said in an interview. "I would hope that in the course of the next month that our move pushes industry to come forward with some protection. I expect that there will be some level of conservation, but from what I can see, it is not going be at the scale that is required to keep our boreal forests healthy."

She said Canopy will be informing key purchasers of paper about her group's disappointment with the CBFA, while striving to develop new partnerships with individual forestry firms in priority areas such as Quebec's Broadback Valley region.

Last month, Greenpeace Canada backed away from its allegations that Montreal-based Resolute Forest Products Inc. had contravened the CBFA.

Mark Hubert, vice-president of environmental leadership at the Forest Products Association of Canada, said it is not easy to reach consensus as companies try to maintain a vibrant forestry business and environmental groups lobby to protect endangered areas.

"It is hugely complex. We wish things were moving faster. We would like to see implementation progress more quickly, but we still have a critical mass of support. That's what is important," said Mr. Hubert, who was in Vancouver on Wednesday for a CBFA meeting of industry and environmental representatives. "One less organization is not going to make or break the CBFA."

Janet Sumner, executive director of the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society's Wildlands League chapter, said logging has continued in some caribou habitat, but her group intends to participate in negotiations as long as progress is possible.

Story continues below advertisement

"Every group needs to do its own assessment. You can have a great process, but we can't just talk. Somebody needs to agree to something," Ms. Sumner said. "All we're doing is talking while there's logging. It is complex, but we need to see something by the third anniversary and we're definitely pushing for results."

Canada's foresters estimate that half of the country's lumber production comes from trees harvested in the boreal forest.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter