Skip to main content

Mary Ellen Turpel-Lafond, Representative for Children and Youth in British Columbia, speaks to media in Victoria in November, 2010.

Deddeda Stemler/The Globe and Mail

British Columbia's representative for children and youth has released a scathing report in response to an independent review calling for major changes within the Children's Ministry.

Mary Ellen Turpel-Lafond criticized most of the methodology and conclusions by former B.C. bureaucrat Bob Plecas, saying he was supposed to examine a specific case involving abuse of children who'd been ordered removed from their mother's care.

Instead, Turpel-Lafond said in her review released Friday that Plecas's report calls for sweeping policy, program and legal reforms within the ministry without consultation with her office, aboriginal leaders, communities or any children in care.

Story continues below advertisement

She urged the ministry and the legislature to pause any implementation of the report until consultation can occur and to revise its terms of reference because the findings come before completion of the case he was originally hired to review.

The government has referred to the report as a "road map for a four-year, multi-faceted strategic plan."

The former bureaucrat was appointed last July to review ministry practices after a B.C. Supreme Court judge found social workers showed "reckless disregard" by ignoring a court order and allowing a father unsupervised visits with his children.

That allegedly led to the abuse of one child, although the father is appealing that court decision.

Turpel-Lafond, who has been the independent children's watchdog for nine years, said she's also concerned about Plecas's assertion that independent oversight of B.C.'s child welfare system may, in a very short time, no longer be needed.

She took issue with Plecas's conclusion that deaths and serious injuries to children in government care "occur rarely." More than 2,000 children were critically injured between July 2007 and September 2015 and 814 kids have died, Turpel-Lafond said.

"It would be useful for the reader of your report to have that data, as a reasonable person may differ with your client's descriptor of rare," her report said.

Story continues below advertisement

She said the terms and references of Plecas's report, issued last December, did not include examining her role as the children's representative and that the Children's Ministry denied her access to material that he used.

"There are significant factual errors and omissions that the representative would like to see corrected as they pertain to the report's description of her office, before the report is disclosed any further," her lawyer wrote in a Dec. 11 letter the ministry about Plecas's interim report.

It said errors included Plecas's assertion that communication between Turpel-Lafond's office and the Children's Ministry had "broken down completely at times" and that "tension permeates everything that involves the two organizations."

Claudia Wilimovsky, who was a media spokeswoman for Plecas last December, said he was out of the country for up to 10 days and would not be available to comment.

In a Jan. 27 letter to Children's Minister Stephanie Cadieux, Turpel-Lafond said the relationship between the two offices has been "marked by a high degree of professionalism and collaboration."

She also asked Cadieux to issue a public statement saying she would decline to accept portions of Plecas's report concerning external oversight.

Story continues below advertisement

"I hope you can appreciate that targeting my leadership as representative and my office in such a high profile public report is unfair and extends beyond me personally to the staff of the Representative for Children and Youth."

Cadieux was not immediately available to comment.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies