Skip to main content

To date B.C. has planted about seven million trees and plans to plant about 10 million by 2016.

Ben Nelms/Bloomberg

After saying for weeks that the amount of farmland being lost to carbon sequestration projects in B.C. is not a significant problem, the provincial government has written to the head of a foreign company suggesting that it indeed is an issue of concern.

British-based multinational Reckitt Benckiser has been buying farmland and replanting trees to sequester carbon, thereby taking the land out of agricultural production. But in a letter, the government has told the company it must get approval from the Agricultural Land Commission if it wants to register a covenant in B.C. that would allow it to trade carbon credits.

The covenant would force the land to be protected from future logging for 100 years. Farmers and ranchers in the Cariboo suggest that means the land would be out of agricultural production for that long.

Story continues below advertisement

But a company representative said in an e-mail Thursday that it is not trading in carbon credits, and has not registered any covenants on land in B.C.

"As of May 10, 2015, we currently own 10,519 hectares. To date we have planted about 7 million trees and have planned to plant approximately 10 million by 2016," stated Lynn Kenney.

"RB has not registered a covenant on title to the lands it acquired in British Columbia that would restrict the use of such lands."

She said the company is planting trees to offset emissions from its own global operations. "I want to be clear that RB does not buy, sell or trade credits through any established programs. Instead, Trees for Change is a program we have developed to meet our own internal targets for environmental sustainability," Ms. Kenney wrote.

Last month, the government dismissed the concerns of Cariboo farmers, saying an inconsequential amount of land – only about 1,500 hectares – had been reforested for carbon sequestration. But last week the government adjusted that estimate, saying perhaps 8,500 hectares of arable land had been reforested.

Derek Sturko, deputy minister of agriculture for B.C., wrote on Wednesday to Rakesh Kapoor, the chief executive officer of Reckitt Benckiser, to advise him of B.C.'s concerns. He advised Mr. Kapoor that only 5 per cent of the provincial land base is suitable for agricultural production, and that the government established the agricultural land reserve (ALR) in the 1970s specifically to protect that land.

"The public concern which has been raised about RB's Trees for Change Programme is due to the perception that your company wishes to permanently remove land in the ALR from agricultural production," Mr. Sturko wrote. He referred to the Reckitt Benckiser website, on which the company explains it is reforesting land previously cleared for cultivation and that it is "committed to ensuring our trees remain in situ for 100 years."

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Sturko said that while planting and growing trees is allowed on ALR land, "it is our understanding that if someone wants to restrict the agricultural use of land, such as purposely planting trees and then preventing trees from being removed for one hundred years, this would require a covenant." He cautioned the company that any such covenant would need to be approved by the ALC.

Lana Popham, agriculture critic for the NDP, said farmers in the Cariboo are alarmed so much arable land is being replanted to forest, and the practice needs to be stopped.

"There are many concerns. A major one of course is losing food-growing lands," she said. "[Local farmers] also feel this company is gutting their community. They are taking away economic opportunities. They are taking over properties. They are tearing down houses so they don't have to pay property tax. They are contributing nothing to this community at all and somehow they are benefiting from it through a carbon offset program."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter