Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

A bridge, seen in the conceptual rendering above, has been proposed to replace the George Massey Tunnel, which connects Richmond and Delta.

A Metro Vancouver committee of mayors and other municipal leaders is expected to call on the federal government to launch an environmental assessment of controversial provincial plans for a 10-lane toll bridge to replace the Massey Tunnel.

On Thursday, the Intergovernmental and Finance Committee of Metro Vancouver is to vote on a recommendation suggesting the board send a letter to the federal Environment Minister, urging her to order the assessment.

Members of the 10-person committee include the mayors of Port Coquitlam, Richmond, Port Moody, Burnaby, Coquitlam and North Vancouver.

Story continues below advertisement

Committee chair Raymond Louie, a Vancouver city councillor and vice-chair of Metro Vancouver, said he was confident the recommendation would pass.

"The federal minister should be taking the opportunity to review this," Mr. Louie said on Wednesday.

"They should have a look at it and determine whether or not there are adverse environmental effects, address any public concerns of those effects and determine how to best deal with them."

Mr. Louie said the province has not given Metro Vancouver enough time to consider and offer its feedback on the proposed $3.5-billion bridge, about 20 kilometres south of downtown Vancouver.

The bridge would replace a 57-year-old tunnel that runs under the Fraser River estuary between Richmond and the municipality of Delta. The province is proposing a 10-lane bridge that would open in 2022.

Mr. Louie noted the province released a project report in mid-December and sought Metro's response by Jan. 28 and simultaneously, through the B.C. Environmental Assessment Office, imposed a Feb. 10 deadline for a response from Metro to their pursuit of an assessment certificate.

"This is far too short of a period of time for Metro Vancouver to provide a detailed response," he said.

Story continues below advertisement

"The province seems intent on moving ahead with this, and the timelines they have set out are unreasonable in terms of providing public consultation."

Mr. Louie says he has varied concerns about the project, including its impact on regional water infrastructure, regional growth and air quality, given the prospect of increased traffic due to the bridge.

Malcolm Brodie, mayor of Richmond and a member of the committee voting Thursday, said a federal review would bring helpful perspectives to the discussion about building the bridge and also help guide Ottawa on funding commitments for the project.

Richmond would prefer an expansion of the existing tunnel, but has not taken any formal position on the bridge. However, Mr. Brodie said, the city has many questions about the proposed bridge.

He said he expects the provincial assessment to be positive. "I am looking for a deeper assessment," he said referring to a possible federal review.

Mr. Brodie said he has not received any federal response to a call from Richmond for a federal review.

Story continues below advertisement

Responding to Metro Vancouver, the B.C. Transportation Ministry said in a statement that the bridge project does not automatically trigger a federal environmental assessment under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, "but the provincial process provides a similar level of scrutiny to that of a federal review."

The ministry also noted that staff have met 20 times since 2012 with their Metro Vancouver counterparts, and 70 times each with staff from Delta and Richmond – the communities on either side of the bridge.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies