Skip to main content

Lawyer Dan Soiseth, of the Community Legal Assistance Society, speaks about his client Bianca Lovado. Lovado, a transgender woman who was forced to stay in a men's jail, is taking the case to a British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal.

DARRYL DYCK/THE CANADIAN PRESS

A lawyer for a transgender woman who was forced to stay in a men's jail says his client hopes her human-rights case against the British Columbia government will change policies for other inmates.

Dan Soiseth said his client Jaris Lovado, who calls herself Bianca, was incarcerated at the Surrey Pretrial Centre for five months last year before being moved to a women's facility after filing multiple complaints.

The Justice Ministry tried to have Ms. Lovado's complaint to the BC Human Rights Tribunal dismissed, but the tribunal ruled the case is worthy of a further hearing.

Story continues below advertisement

BC Corrections has a policy of housing inmates according to their self-identified gender unless health and safety concerns can't be resolved.

The ministry told the tribunal that during a previous stay at the Alouette Correctional Centre for Women, Ms. Lovado engaged in inappropriate relationships with female inmates and posed a safety risk to women who may have experienced trauma.

It also said Ms. Lovado displayed a "male persona."

"We don't know exactly what that means," Mr. Soiseth said.

Mr. Soiseth, who represents the Community Legal Assistance Society, said there was no evidence provided of any safety concerns and it's not unusual for inmates to have relationships.

He said the main issue is that Ms. Lovado, who was serving time for fraud-related charges and breaching conditions of release, faced discrimination as a transgender person and her needs were not met until she complained.

Ms. Lovado was moved to the women's facility in Maple Ridge last September after she agreed to meet behavioural expectations.

Story continues below advertisement

The tribunal's written decision stated that Alouette Correctional Centre initially declined to accept Ms. Lovado as a transfer based on information from BC Corrections that she'd been living in the community as a male.

The decision said an April 26, 2016, e-mail from the deputy warden to the assistant warden at Surrey Pretrial said Ms. Lovado refused to be skin frisked by a male but that the deputy said Ms. Lovado should undergo that procedure because she had "all the equipment of a male."

Ms. Lovado requested a "female Alouette Centre diet" while at Surrey Pretrial, but was told that wasn't possible, the ruling said. The tribunal noted BC Corrections branch did provide her with female underwear including bras and make-up from Alouette.

Corrections said in its application for dismissal that staff at the Surrey Pretrial Centre ensured Ms. Lovado was placed in areas where she could have adequate privacy.

"It says it also ensured Ms. Lovado's physical and mental health-care needs were addressed in a timely manner," the ruling said.

Ms. Lovado did not respond to requests for comment and the Justice Ministry said it could not provide information until the election writ is returned.

Report an error
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter