Skip to main content
Welcome to
super saver spring
offer ends april 20
save over $140
Sale ends in
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks
Welcome to
super saver spring
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks
save over $140
// //

A proposed $2.5-billion run-of-river project on the Klinaklini River is dead, dropped from BC Hydro's roster for clean-power contracts one day after Environment Minister Barry Penner vowed to oppose the scheme.

The Kleana power project would have generated two-thirds as much energy as the massive Site C dam that the provincial government has approved on the Peace River.

Kleana's president said the project could be built with a fraction of the ecological footprint of Site C, but Mr. Penner said it threatened protected wetlands, fish-bearing streams, old-growth forest and grizzly-bear habitat.

Story continues below advertisement

The project would have required a weir, or dam, as high as 30 metres. The proposal was in the hands of BC Hydro, an arm's-length Crown corporation. But Mr. Penner had some leverage: The proposal required his approval to change the boundaries of a nature conservancy that is part of what is known as the Great Bear Rainforest, a protected area developed after a decade of consultation with environmentalists.

"I will not be recommending that the boundaries of the Upper Klinaklini conservancy be amended in order to facilitate this project," Mr. Penner told the legislature on Wednesday.

On Thursday, BC Hydro approved two new electricity purchase agreements under its Clean Power Call. Notably absent was the Kleana power project, and an official confirmed it is no longer under consideration.

"We are delighted," said Vicky Husband, of the Watershed Watch Salmon Society. The run of the river project was so large, she said, it shouldn't be measured as green energy.

"This was not a project that should have ever been considered," she added.

Claire Trevena, the New Democratic Party MLA for North Island, applauded Mr. Penner's decision.

"It would have meant the mass industrialization of the Klinaklini River," she said. "The fact that the minister has now said that it won't be going ahead is great news for that river - but we still have lots of projects that are of great concern in the rush for private power."

Story continues below advertisement

Under the Clean Energy Act introduced in the legislature last week, BC Hydro will not be allowed to even entertain proposals for power projects if they fall within a park or conservancy. But the legislation is not yet in force, and groups such as Ms. Husband's were concerned that the Kleana project could be approved in the interim.

Mr. Penner said BC Hydro should have understood the government's intent, however, when it tabled that provision. "It's pretty clear direction to BC Hydro, to put something in a statute," he said in an interview.

Alexander Eunall, president of Kleana, could not be reached Thursday. But in an earlier interview, he defended the project as far cleaner than the proposed Site C dam, which has been sent for an environmental assessment.

"It is the cleanest kilowatt hours produced anywhere in British Columbia," he said. Asked whether the new Clean Energy Act would effectively kill his proposal, he suggested the proposal could still be amended. "We will adapt and adjust and move forward."

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies