Skip to main content

A aerial view shows the Mount Polley mine near the town of Likely, B.C. Tuesday, August, 5, 2014.

JONATHAN HAYWARD/THE CANADIAN PRESS

Operators and engineers at the Mount Polley mine were overconfident in the design of a tailings-storage facility that collapsed and created an environmental disaster, says British Columbia's chief inspector of mines.

Al Hoffman also found weak water-management standards at the site but said Thursday he couldn't find enough evidence to pursue charges under the Mines Act against Imperial Metals Corp.

"There were no non-compliance [issues] that we could find," Mr. Hoffman told reporters. "That doesn't mean there won't be in the future. We're going to tighten up our regulations and improve our oversight."

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Hoffman's report into the Mount Polley disaster makes 19 recommendations, including that all mines with the same storage facilities employ designated mine-safety managers and staff to oversee the management of tailings.

The disaster and the 15-month investigation, the largest and most-complex mining probe in B.C. history, has taken its toll on him personally, Mr. Hoffman said.

"It's been the most difficult period of my entire career, to be blunt," he said.

"It's something I never hoped would happen on my watch. Now, I feel very strongly that we have the recommendations going forward that we can, to a large extent, prevent this from ever happening again."

An independent panel of engineering experts appointed by the B.C. government reached similar conclusions about the cause of the tailings-pond breach last January.

Both reports found the spill was caused by a poorly designed dam that didn't account for drainage and erosion failures associated with glacial till beneath the pond.

"The root causes of the event were organizational," Mr. Hoffman said. "My report describes how a mistaken belief in the foundation characteristics led to a design of a dam that was inadequate for its location."

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Hoffman's report said the company and its engineers "did not fully recognize and manage geotechnical and water management risks associated with design, construction ... and operation of the tailings storage facility."

Mines Minister Bill Bennett said he accepts the report's recommendations and plans to introduce legislation that cracks down on companies that do not comply with mining regulations.

"I hope to be taking legislation forward in the spring that will authorize administrative penalties under the mining legislation so that we can levy penalties easily, quickly when necessary, and that obviously will help us in terms of compliance," he told reporters.

Mr. Bennett said Mr. Hoffman's investigation confirms that weak practices at a mine site increase the risk of failure and environmental consequences.

"This is unacceptable," he said in a statement.

Opposition New Democrat mines critic Norm Macdonald said he's concerned the report does not include sanctions or charges.

Story continues below advertisement

He said neither the government nor the company is being held accountable for a disaster with environmental, social and economic impacts.

"This is business as usual," he said. "Nobody's responsible for what went wrong here."

Last month, the province granted Imperial Metals a short-term permit to discharge treated water from a Mount Polley storage pit into nearby Hazeltine Creek and through a pipeline into Quesnel Lake.

Williams Lake Mayor Walk Cobb said the permit allows 200 people at the mine to continue working and could result in up 170 others being recalled to the site.

B.C. mines inspector report on Mount Polley

Report an error
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter