Skip to main content

The tailings pond collapse at Mount Polley gold and copper mine last August spilled 10 million cubic metres of contaminated water into the waterways below.

JONATHAN HAYWARD/THE CANADIAN PRESS

Thousands of kilometres of salmon-rich waterways and the drinking water of hundreds of communities in central and Northern British Columbia are at risk of mining-related environmental disasters, a new report warns.

The survey from the BC First Nations Energy and Mining Council is being released just ahead of a decision by the provincial government on the application to restart the Mount Polley gold and copper mine after the catastrophic tailings pond collapse last August that spilled 10 million cubic metres of contaminated water into the waterways below.

In January, an expert panel report on the Mount Polley incident concluded that, based on past performance, British Columbia can expect to see two failures of tailings ponds every 10 years – a not-insignificant risk that spurred calls for an overhaul of the province's regulatory regime for the mining industry.

Story continues below advertisement

The mining council has, for the first time, mapped out the 35 active mine tailings ponds in the northern half of the province and traced the potential paths of contaminants from dam failures at any of those sites.

The survey found that 80 per cent of the chinook and sockeye salmon in the region are either downstream from a tailings facility or would migrate up a river that could be contaminated.

It also concluded that there are risks to the drinking water of 33 First Nations and 208 other communities, including Prince George, Smithers and Terrace. The degree of risk in each case would depend on the geology and the magnitude of the failure.

"The independent panel report has to be viewed as a wake-up call to Canadians about these tailings ponds," said Dave Porter, chief executive officer of the mining council. "They pose the risk of an [environmental] disaster on the scale we've seen at Mount Polley. It has galvanized us to do something. Our report is a tool for our communities and others to understand the potential impacts."

British Columbia's north is poised for an explosion of new-mine development. The provincial government has pushed for the creation of mines as part of its jobs plan, building a new power transmission line to encourage industrial development in the northwest and promising to cut red tape for mine permits.

At the same time, First Nations, buoyed by last year's Supreme Court of Canada victory on aboriginal rights and title, are demanding a greater role in determining what resource development can take place in their traditional territories.

That heightened recognition of aboriginal rights led the province to purchase 61 disputed coal licences last month to avert a mining conflict in an area considered sacred by the Tahltan First Nations.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Porter said the survey will help communities understand which watersheds are at risk, but he also hopes it will put pressure on the B.C. government to impose tougher environmental standards on mines.

"I think we need some oversight," he said.

The B.C. government has promised to review its mining regulations this summer to respond to the expert panel report.

Mr. Porter said government and industry must work with First Nations to build a better model for mining. He said there needs to be an expansion of protected areas based on at-risk watersheds. He is also calling for the creation of an industry fund to ensure financing for clean-up and remediation.

The expert panel on the Mount Polley disaster concluded that the design of the tailings pond was flawed because it failed to address the unstable foundation of the dam. That mistake was compounded over the years as the dam was repeatedly raised to contain the mine's growing lake of contaminated water.

In response to the January report, the province ordered all operating mines to inspect the foundations of their tailings pond dams – 123 in total. The results are due by the end of June.

Story continues below advertisement

In the meantime, there are still two investigations under way into the Mount Polley incident that could lead to charges or fines. One, from the Chief Inspector of Mines, is due in mid-June. But the decision on whether to allow the company to restart the mine, which is expected by early July, does not hinge upon those findings.

B.C. First Nations Energy and Mining Council report

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.