Skip to main content
A scary good deal on trusted journalism
Get full digital access to globeandmail.com
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks SAVE OVER $140
OFFER ENDS OCTOBER 31
A scary good deal on trusted journalism
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
SAVE OVER $140
OFFER ENDS OCTOBER 31
// //

Lee Carter, left, and her husband Hollis Johnson leave a news conference where photos of Carter’s mother, Kay Carter, are shown in Vancouver in April 2011.

Darryl Dyck/The Globe and Mail

When Kay Carter travelled to a clinic in Switzerland more than three years ago to drink a toxic dose of sodium pentobarbital and end her body's steady decline, the journey was cloaked in secrecy.

With assisted suicide still a crime in Canada, the plan was kept from the 89-year-old's family, friends and caregivers. Her grandchildren were not told until two months before the trip, when preparations were well under way. Others found out after Ms. Carter's ashes were scattered in a Swiss forest.

A day before her death in January, 2010, surrounded by several of her children in Zurich, Ms. Carter dictated a brief letter explaining her decision.

Story continues below advertisement

"In my latter years, as my health deteriorated, I witnessed friends whose body had totally collapsed and did not want to follow in their path," Ms. Carter, who had been diagnosed with a degenerative spinal cord condition two years earlier, wrote to 125 friends, family members and colleagues.

"My journey to Zurich … was filled with laughter and fond reminiscing. Do not mourn my passing, but rejoice, as I have, in our shared memories."

The letter set the stage for Ms. Carter to become a central figure in a legal challenge of Canada's assisted-suicide ban on which the B.C. Court of Appeal will rule on Thursday.

"At that moment, when we mailed those letters just after she died, it became public," recalls Ms. Carter's daughter, Lee, who is among the plaintiffs in the case. "She wanted it that way. She wanted Canadians to have a dialogue and a discussion. She would just be thrilled if she knew where this has gone."

The B.C. Supreme Court ruled last year that the ban on assisted suicide violates the rights of the gravely ill.

The judge concluded the law must allow physician-assisted suicide and physician-assisted death – also known as voluntary euthanasia – for patients who are diagnosed with a serious illness or disability and have "intolerable" physical or psychological suffering with no chance of improvement.

The court gave Parliament a year to fix the law, while also granting another plaintiff in the case, ALS patient Gloria Taylor, an immediate exemption from the ban. Ms. Taylor died in October of last year, without taking advantage of the exemption.

Story continues below advertisement

Ottawa appealed, arguing physician-assisted suicide would demean the value of life and put vulnerable people at risk.

The issue is expected to end up at the Supreme Court of Canada, which last considered assisted suicide in 1993, when it upheld the current law in a case involving Sue Rodriguez. Ms. Rodriguez, who also had ALS or Lou Gehrig's Disease, died with the help of a doctor the next year.

The issue of physician-assisted suicide is receiving renewed attention across the country.

The Royal Society of Canada issued a report two years ago that recommended legalizing physician-assisted suicide, and an editorial last year in the Canadian Medical Association Journal called for a national debate.

Politicians in Quebec are examining a bill that would permit physician-assisted suicide.

Two weeks ago, a video recorded by Donald Low, a respected doctor who guided Toronto through the 2003 SARS crisis, made headlines for his impassioned argument in favour of legalizing doctor-assisted suicide.

Story continues below advertisement

Wayne Sumner, a professor emeritus from the University of Toronto and author of Assisted Death: A Study in Ethics and Law, says the winds appear to be changing.

"The Rodriguez decision was 20 years ago, and so much has changed. Even then, it was a split decision," Mr. Sumner said, referring to judgments at the B.C. Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court of Canada in the Rodriguez case.

Mr. Sumner says even if the federal Conservatives opposed assisted suicide, Ottawa may have to open up the debate.

The federal government has insisted there will be no debate, warning that any attempts by the provinces to allow assisted suicide would likely spark new court challenges.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies