Skip to main content
//empty //empty

B.C. Teachers Federation president Jim Iker says the labour board set safety and supervision guidelines during the last teacher dispute.

DARRYL DYCK/The Globe and Mail

The preparation for job action between the union representing B.C.'s public school teachers and the government intensified Friday into acrimonious accusations about student safety.

Peter Cameron, the government's chief negotiator, said he found it bizarre that the B.C. Teachers Federation did not respond to his proposal to work out an agreement on supervising students during job action.

BCTF President Jim Iker responded that Cameron appears to be attempting to provoke public sentiment against the teachers.

Story continues below advertisement

Iker said the union told Cameron at the bargaining table that they were applying to the Labour Relations Board for an essential services designation, and part of that designation would involve setting guidelines to ensure students are supervised outside of the classroom during a dispute.

Cameron told a news conference Friday in Victoria that the government has concerns about the BCTF's phased-in job action that includes refusal to perform mandated supervision of students outside of class time.

In a March 28 letter to Iker, Cameron stated: "Your proposed Phase 1 includes a refusal to 'perform mandated supervision outside of class time.' British Columbia Public School Employers' Association believes that this aspect of your proposed strike activity could threaten the safety of students. As a result, we seek from you an agreement to ensure sufficient resources are available to maintain he safety of students."

Cameron told reporters he wasn't implying the teachers were willing to put the safety of students at risk during contract talks, but he called their refusal to respond to his letter "kind of a bizarre sequence of things."

"On the face of their job action plan, it creates an apprehension of danger that's quite legitimate," he said. "So, how do we deal with it?"

BCTF said it plans to launch job action in phases to force a settlement with the government. The first part involves refusing to perform supervisory duties outside of the classroom, with an escalation to rotating strikes and finally a full-scale walkout.

Cameron said negotiations are currently moving slowly and he forecast some form of teacher job action before the end of the school year.

Story continues below advertisement

Iker said the teachers did not respond to Cameron's letter about student supervision because the union had applied to the Labour Relations Board for a ruling on essential services, which includes student supervision.

Iker said the same issue was resolved by the LRB during the last teacher dispute about two years ago.

"I think he's trying to provoke the public against us," he said. "Students have always been safe and supervised in any of our actions because there's always an agreement or decision made on making sure that there is enough management people to do that supervision."

Last month, the teachers who cast ballots voted 89 per cent in favour of strike action.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies