Skip to main content

Douglas Channel, the proposed termination point for an oil pipeline in the Enbridge Northern Gateway Project, is pictured in an aerial view in Kitimat, B.C., on Jan. 10, 2012.

Darryl Dyck/The Canadian Press/Darryl Dyck/The Canadian Press

The Sierra Club says B.C. is vastly under-reporting is greenhouse gas emissions by not counting pollution from forest and fossil fuel exports, but the province's environment minister says it doesn't need to report emissions it can't control and the club is playing politics with the issue.

In a report released Thursday, the Sierra Club says the province's greenhouse gas emissions would quadruple when exported products are added in.

The organization says the B.C. government has reported that the province's 2010 emissions dropped by 4.5 per cent to 62 million tonnes, but the province's annual emissions are actually more than 250 million tonnes when pollution from forests and fossil fuel exports are included.

Story continues below advertisement

The report says proposals for the Northern Gateway oil pipeline and new natural gas terminals and coal mines would add another 400 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions a year.

But Environment Minister Terry Lake is rejecting the findings of the report, saying the Sierra Club knows international agreements don't require the province to report emissions that are beyond its control, including those associated with exported products.

Mr. Lake says the Club is led by George Heyman, who plans to run for the NDP in the next provincial election, and he says managing climate change should not be made into a political football.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies