Skip to main content

Andrew Weaver finds himself in the middle of a gathering political storm, with the Opposition New Democrats and governing Liberals on his left and right.

The Globe and Mail

He is a climate scientist who has become a political lightning rod at British Columbia's legislature.

Andrew Weaver, B.C.'s lone Green party member of the legislature, spent years espousing and debating climate change theories in the academic world. Now he finds himself in the middle of a gathering political storm, with the Opposition New Democrats and governing Liberals on his left and right.

In recent months, the Liberals have been goading the New Democrats by calling Mr. Weaver the legislature's most effective Opposition politician, while the New Democrats, who have 34 members, say their focus is on holding the government to account, and it's Mr. Weaver who often votes with the government.

Story continues below advertisement

And Mr. Weaver – who recently popped in for a visit to the B.C. press gallery wearing jeans and a Neil Young anti-oil sands tour hoodie, said there's no place he'd rather be than stuck between the two opposing fronts.

B.C.'s politicians are set to return to the legislature Tuesday for the spring session where they will debate the government's budget. Mr. Weaver recently announced he sees bright days ahead for the Greens and he will seek the party's leadership and run again in his Victoria-area Oak Bay-Gordon Head riding in 2017.

"They can all go worry and play politics about what they want to do," said Mr. Weaver about Liberal and NDP strategies to inflate or mitigate his political value. "I'm not worried about that. I'm worried about our party, our Green party and providing alternatives for people."

Premier Christy Clark and NDP Leader John Horgan admit Mr. Weaver's role in the legislature plays a large part in the current political environment even though he represents a single vote. With the current standings at 49 Liberals, 34 NDP and two Independents, Mr. Weaver's lone voice isn't enough to swing votes, but there's weight in his political potential.

Ms. Clark, who called the NDP irrelevant and in search of an identity last fall, said recently she hasn't seen much from the Opposition to change her viewpoint.

"Are you telling me you think the NDP is going to do a better job this session?" Ms. Clark said.

"I haven't seen them come forward with very many ideas. I'm sure Andrew Weaver will have a lot of ideas for us, some of which we'll disagree with, but at least it will be a principled and focused debate."

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Horgan said the Liberals are using Weaver to deflect attention from the political wounds the NDP has inflicted upon the Liberals, including forcing former advanced education minister Amrik Virk from his cabinet post over his involvement in hiring breaches at Kwantlen Polytechnic University.

NDP house leader Mike Farnworth said he has often worked with Mr. Weaver in the legislature and he views Liberal endorsements of the lone Green as an attempt to draw attention away from Liberals policies.

"I find it fascinating that [the Premier] wants to bring Andrew Weaver up," Mr. Farnworth said. "I'm wondering why she's not promoting some of her own back bench. She seems to be more interested in Andrew Weaver than she is in her own back bench."

Mr. Weaver's academic boss at the University of Victoria said life as a scientist, and especially a climate scientist, provides Mr. Weaver with the perfect training ground for B.C. politics.

"When you are involved in climate science and modelling the climate, and indeed demonstrating that global warming is real and driven in large part by humans, you kind of necessarily become political whether you want to or not," said Stephen Johnston, director of the school of ocean sciences.

"He's always been tough-skinned," said Mr. Johnston. "Science is not for the gentle hearted."

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies