Skip to main content
// //

Retired judge Thomas Braidwood speaks after releasing his final report into the Taser-related death of Robert Dziekanski in Vancouver on June 18, 2010.

DARRYL DYCK/THE CANADIAN PRESS

The man who oversaw a high-profile public inquiry into Taser use following the death of Robert Dziekanski says he is "very impressed" with the British Columbia government's response to his report, saying all of his recommendations have been addressed in some way.

Thomas Braidwood, whose public inquiry recommended tighter restrictions on how and when Tasers are used, has appeared at a legislative committee examining the use and regulation of the stun guns.

Mr. Braidwood walked the committee through his recommendations, including limiting the cases in which the weapon is used and changing the way officers are trained, and in each case he said he was satisfied with the response.

Story continues below advertisement

He says the fact that Taser use has declined in the province by 87 per cent since 2007 suggests the government and police officers are heeding his warning that the stun guns are dangerous.

Mr. Braidwood repeated his position that, while their use should be limited, Tasers are a valuable alternative to deadly force and society is better off with them.

The public inquiry was prompted by the death of Polish immigrant Robert Dziekanski, who was repeatedly stunned by an RCMP Taser at Vancouver's airport in October 2007.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies